Issue 2 (35)

BRIDGE: MYTH, SYMBOL, METAPHOR
Year 2012 Number 2(35)
Pages 77-82 Type scientific article
UDC 39 BBK 63.5
Authors Kotstsi Paolo
Topic
Summary The author performed an anthropological study of “historical” bridges in Italy.In this article the researcher outlined the general underlying concepts of the study, explained various meanings of the bridge concept, analyzed the dualism of holiness and hybris.Most of the research was focused on the study of classical sources on the subject indicating the essence of a bridge – a desire to bring together two different “banks”: this is also the subject matter of any anthropological study, hence a bridge might be treated as a metaphor designating the discipline of anthropology.
Keywords bridge, myth, symbol, the supernatural order, anthropology, communication
References

Nietzsche F. Così parlò Zarathustra. Milano, 1965. 284 р.
Ницше Ф. Так говорил Заратустра//Ницше Ф. Соч.: в 2 т. Т. 2. М., 1990. 829 с.
Eschilo. I Persiani//Eschilo, Sofocle, Euripide. Tutte le tragedie. Milano, 2011. 3084 р.
Kipling R. I costruttori di ponti. Milano, 1994. 100 р.
Platone. Fedro. Bari, 2005. LXI+172 р.
Alighieri D. La divina commedia. Milano, 2007. 4 vol. 3367 р.
Данте Алигьери. Божественная комедия/пер. М. Лозинского. М., 2004. 640 с.
Эсхил. Персы//Эсхил. Трагедии/пер. В. Иванова. М., 1989. 589 с.
Киплинг Р. Собрание сочинений: в 6 т. Т. 4. М., 1996. 448 с.
10. Cantoni R. Il senso del tragico e il piacere. Milano, 1978. 210 р.
Hubert Н., Mauss M. Essai sur la nature et la fonction du sacrifice//Mauss M. Oeuvres. P., 1968. Т. 1. 634 p.
Devoto G. Avviamento alla etimologia italiana: Dizionario etimologico. Milano, 2001. 518 р.
Levi Della Torre S. Mosaico: attualità e inattualità degli Ebrei. Torino, 1994. 178 р.

 
Download in PDF