Issue 3 (60)

PROBLEMS OF THE FAR NORTH-EAST OF EUROPE ENEOLITHIC CHRONOLOGY
Year 2018 Number 3(60)
Pages 115-125 Type scientific article
UDC 902.652(470.1) BBK 64.442.15(235.5)
Authors Karmanov Victor N.
Topic THE CHRONOLOGY OF THE NEOLITHIC AND ENEOLITHIC EURASIA
Summary The article studies the current state of the problem of archaeological sites chronology on the basis of summing up and systematization of the available data on the Eneolithic sites of the Far North-East of Europe (the basins of the rivers Pechora, Mezen, and Vychegda) as part of the planned review of the sources. This is a step towards the creation of an adequate cultural processes model in the Eneolithic of this territory. It was established that geo-morphologically the archaeological contexts of the region referred to the upper levels of the sand eolian deposits, which limited the researchers options in the choice of methodology for the determination of the age of the studied sites, first of all, this involved the principle of similar phenomena and attributes synchronization, as well as the sporadic radiocarbon charcoal dating. Only in one case we were able to realize the opportunity to build a relative chronology for the multi-culture sites. We also noted the instability of the comparative-typological methodology outcomes, this could probably be explained by its incorrect application to the incompatible in terms of the source-study materials without taking into account the regional specifics of such sources formation. Based on the study of the radiocarbon dating results for the complexes of the Chuzhjyaelskaya and the Choinovtinskaya cultures as well as the respective sampling context, we have identified 9 dates out of 19 determinations, which could have been valid for the Eneolithic, and identified the reliable data. It was established that the period of the second half of the 4th — the beginning of the 3rd millennium BC, i. e. the period of the existence of the comb stamp geometrism historical and cultural community, was pretty well covered by the independently obtained dates. The age of the Choinovtinskaya or the Garinskaya culture complexes of the 3rd millennium BC was not so well substantiated. We believe that the problems with the independent dating of the region's contexts were to a great extent caused by the deformations and the bioturbation of the culture bearing sediments, as well as the incorrect documentation of the samples. The authors plan to continue the study of the problem on the basis of a search for and comparison of the compatible contexts, as well as the expansion of the range of independent dating techniques.
Keywords Far Northeast Europe, Eneolithic, chronology, Chuzhjyaelskaya culture, Choinovtinskaya culture
References

Burov G. M. [Review of the books: Stokolos V. S. Ancient settlements of Mezenskaya valley. Moscow: Nauka, 1986; Cultures of the Early Metal Age of the Northern Urals. Moscow: Nauka, 1988]. Rossiyskaya arkheologiya [Russian Archaeology], 1992, no. 3, pp. 236–246. (in Russ.).

Burov G. M. Krayniy Severo-Vostok Evropy v epokhu mezolita, neolita i rannego metalla: avtoref. doctor diss. [The Far North-East of Europe in the Mesolithic, Neolithic and Early Metal Age: Abst. Diss. Doct.]. Novosibirsk, 1986, 37 p. (in Russ.).

Chairkina N. M. Eneolit Srednego Zaural’ya [Eneolithic of the Middle Trans-Urals]. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN Publ., 2005, 313 p. (in Russ.).

Danilov A. V., Karmanov V. N. [The planning of the parking-workshop of the Bronze Age of Pezmogty 2 on the Middle Vychegda]. Materialy I Vserossiyskoy molodezhnoy nauchnoy konf. «Molodezh’ i nauka na severe» [Proceedings of the 1st All-Russian Youth Scien. Conf. “Youth and Science in the North”]. Syktyvkar: Komi NTS UrO RAN Publ., 2008, vol. 2, pp. 41–42. (in Russ.).

Kanivets V. I. Pechorskoye Pripolyar’ye v epokhu rannego metalla [Pechora Sub-polar in the Early Metal Age]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1974, 150 p. (in Russ.).

Karmanov V. N. [Heat treatment of flint based on the materials of the settlement of the early metal Ugdym I on the Middle Vychegda]. Tverskoy arkheologicheskiy sbornik [Tver archaeological collection]. Tver: “Triada” Publ., 2015, iss. 10, vol. I, pp. 313–324. (in Russ.).

Karmanov V. N., Makarov A. S., Zaretskaya N. E. [New data on chronology of Chuzhyayol’skaya culture (the extreme North-East of Europe)]. Rossiyskaya arkheologiya [Russian Archaeology], 2017, no. 2, pp. 55–62. (in Russ.).

Karmanov V. N., Zelensky V. S., Semenov V. A. [Excavations of the settlement of Vis II]. Arkheologicheskiye otkrytiya 2000 goda [Archaeological discoveries of the year 2000]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2001, p. 21. (in Russ.).

Kosinskaya L. L. [Ceramics of the settlement Niremka I]. Pamyatniki material’noy kul’tury na Evropeyskom Severo-Vostoke [Monuments of material culture in the European North-East]. Syktyvkar: Komi filial AN SSSR Publ., 1986, iss. 10, pp. 35–44. (in Russ.).

Kosinskaya L. L. [To the question of the character of the economy of the population of the Vychegda river basin in the era of the Eneolithic — Early Bronze Age]. Eneolit lesnogo Urala i Povolzh’ya [Eneolithic of the forest Ural and the Volga region]. Izhevsk: UIIYaL UrO RAN Publ., 1990, pp. 120–131. (in Russ.).

Kosinskaya L. L. Mezolit — rannyaya bronza basseyna Nizhney Vychegdy: avtoref. kand. diss. [Mesolithic — Early Bronze Age of the basin of the Lower Vychegda: Abst. Diss. Cand.]. Leningrad, 1988, 24 p. (in Russ.).

Luzgin V. Ye. Drevniye kul’tury Izhmy [Ancient cultures of Izhma]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1972, 128 p. (in Russ.).

Lychagina E. L., Karmanov V. N., Zaretskaya N. E. [New data on chronology of the Eneolithic monuments of the North-East of Europe]. Problemy periodizatsii i khronologii v arkheologii epokhi rannego metalla Vostochnoy Evropy: Materialy tematicheskoy nauch. konf. [Problems of periodization and chronology in the archaeology of the Early Metal Age of Eastern Europe: Materials of the thematic scientific conf.]. Saint Petersburg: “Skifiya-print” Publ., 2013, pp. 161–164. (in Russ.).

Radiouglerodnaya khronologiya neolita Severnoy Evrazii [Radiocarbon chronology of the Neolithic of Northern Eurasia]. Saint Petersburg: Teza Publ., 2004, 157 p. (in Russ.).

Semenov V. A., Nesanelene V. N. Evropeyskiy Severo-Vostok v epokhu bronzy (po materialam raskopok Syktyvkarskogo universiteta): Uchebnoye posobiye [European North-East in the Bronze Age (based on excavations of Syktyvkar University): Textbook]. Syktyvkar: Syktyvkarskiy un-t Publ., 1997, 172 p. (in Russ.).

Shorin A. F. Eneolit Urala i sopredel’nykh territoriy: problemy kul’turogeneza [Eneolithic of the Urals and adjacent territories: problems of cultural genesis]. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN Publ., 1999, 183 p. (in Russ.).

Stokolos V. S. [Settlement of Muchkas on the Mezen]. Etnokul’turnyye kontakty v epokhu kamnya, bronzy, rannego zheleza i srednevekov’ya v Severnom Priural’ye [Ethno-cultural contacts in the Stone Age, Bronze Age, Early Iron Age and the Middle Age in the Northern Urals]. Syktyvkar: Komi nauchnyy tsentr UrO RAN Publ., 1995, iss. 13, pp. 59–64 (in Russ.).

Stokolos V. S. [The Eneolithic and Bronze Age]. Arkheologiya Respubliki Komi [Archaeology of the Komi Republic]. Moscow: DiK Publ., 1997, pp. 213–246. (in Russ.).

Stokolos V. S. Drevniye poseleniya Mezenskoy doliny [Ancient settlements of the Mezen Valley]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1986, 188 p. (in Russ.).

Stokolos V. S. Kul’tury epokhi rannego metalla Severnogo Priural’ya [Cultures of the Early Metal Age of the Northern Urals]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1988, 256 p. (in Russ.).

Vasilyev E. A., Glyzin I. P. [Yasunskaya Eneolithic Culture of the North of Western Siberia]. Kul’tura kak sistema v istoricheskom kontekste: opyt zapadno-sibirskikh arkheologo-etnograficheskikh soveshchaniy. Materialy XV mezhdunar. Zapadno-Sibirskoy arkheologo-etnograficheskoy konf. [Culture as a system in the historical context: Experience of Western Siberian archaeological and ethnographic meetings. Materials 15th International West-Siberian archaeological and ethnographic Conf.]. Tomsk: Agraf-Press Publ., 2010, pp. 121–124. (in Russ.).

Vasilyev E. A., Glyzin I. P. [Yasunsky Settlement — Monument of Eneolithic time in the North of Western Siberia]. Kul’tury i narody Severnoy Azii i sopredel’nykh territorii v kontekste mezhdistsiplinarnogo izucheniya: Sbornik Muzeya arkheologii i etnografii Sibiri [Cultures and peoples of Northern Asia and adjacent territories in the context of interdisciplinary studies: Collection of the Museum of archaeology and ethnography of Siberia]. Tomsk: TomGU Publ., 2008, iss. 2, pp. 97–117. (in Russ.).

Vasilyev S. Yu. [Ancient sites of the place “Borok”. Settlement Pavshino-2]. Velikiy Ustyug. Krayevedcheskiy al’manakh [Great Ustyug. Local history almanac]. Vologda: Legiya Publ., 1995, iss. 1, pp. 43–56. (in Russ.).

Vasilyev S. Yu., Suvorov A. V. [New materials to the archaeological map of the valley of the South river (based on the results of the work of the South archaeological brigade of the SPC “Antiquities of the North”]. Velikiy Ustyug. Krayevedcheskiy al’manakh [Great Ustyug. Local history almanac]. Vologda: Legiya Publ., 2000, iss. 2, pp. 5–31. (in Russ.).

Vaskul I. O. [Shikhovskaya geoarchaeological microdistrict]. Vtoryye Myandinskiye chteniya. Materialy Vseros. nauchn.-prakt. konf. Selo Ust’-Tsil’ma [Second Myandin Readings. Materials of All-Russian scien.-practical ñonf. the village of Ust-Tsilma]. Syktyvkar: Kola Publ., 2011, vol. 2, pp. 4–11. (in Russ.).

 
Download in PDF