Issue 2 (67)

LABOR INVESTMENTS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE KAMENNY AMBAR LATE BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT IN THE KARAGAILY-AYAT RIVER VALLEY
Year 2020 Number 2(67)
Pages 26-34 Type scientific article
UDC 902(470.5)”6377” BBK 63.4(2)
Authors Chechushkov Igor V.
Topic ARCHAEOLOGY OF HABITAT AND LIVELIHOOD
Summary The paper seeks to analyze the labor investment in the construction of the Late Bronze Age walled settlement of Kamenny Ambar in the southern Trans-Urals. Evaluation of labor investments in construction is an effective way to assess the economy, the degree of social complexity, and the religious ideas of past societies. Thus, the architecture of the Sintashta-Petrovka settlements suggests that planning was carried out during their construction, and the work itself required organized collective efforts. Based on the known parameters of architecture, available technologies, ethnography and experimental archaeology, an energetic mathematical model is developed. The model suggests that the settlement could be constructed during one season from May to October by a relatively small group of 100–300 people. At the same time, labor investment in the construction of houses significantly exceeded the volume of labor needed for the construction of a wall-ditch system. Therefore, collective labor does not appear as a significant burden for community members: houses were mainly constructed by their residents, while work on the construction of a ditch and wall was carried out by joint efforts. The paper concludes that the Kamenny Ambar community could be characterized as a simple chiefdom, as the society was complex enough to organize a relatively large group of people for collective work.
Keywords Bronze Age, Sintashta-Petrovka settlements, prehistoric architecture, labor investment, way of life
References

Abrams E. M. How the Maya Built Their World: Energetics and Ancient Architecture. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1994. (in English).

Ashbee P., Cornwall J. W. An experiment in field archaeology. Antiquity, 1961, no. 35, pp. 129–134. (in English).

Berseneva N. A., Epimakhov A. V., Noskevich V. V., Fedorova N. V. [Possibilities of synthesizing geophysical and archaeological information when interpreting the results of excavations (on the example of the Bronze Age settlement Kamenny Ambar)]. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografi i [Bulletin of Archaeology, Anthropology and Ethnography], 2015, no. 1 (28), pp. 4–14. (in Russ.).

Borzunov V. A. [Fortified Eneolithic settlements in the taiga zone of the Ob River valley]. Rossiyskaya arkheologiya [Russian Archaeology], 2016, no. 3, pp. 34–44. (in Russ.).

Borzunov V. A. [Variants of Reconstruction and Development Trends of Stone and Bronze Age Stationary Dwellings in the Taiga Zone of Western Siberia]. Stratum plus. Arkheologiya i kul’turnaya antropologiya [Stratum plus. Archaeology and cultural Anthropology], 2018, no. 2, pp. 347–375. (in Russ.).

Chechushkov I. V. Bronze Age Human Communities in the Southern Urals Steppe: Sintashta-Petrovka Social and Subsistence Organization: Doc. Diss. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 2018. (in English).

Chechushkov I. V., Yakimov A. S., Bachura O. P., Yan Ch. E., Goncharova E. N. [Social Organization of the Sintashta-Petrovka Groups of the Late Bronze Age and a Cause for Origin of Social Elites (Based on Materials of the Settlement of Kamenny Ambar)]. Stratum plus. Arkheologiya i kul’turnaya antropologiya [Stratum plus. Archaeology and cultural Anthropology], 2018, no. 2, pp. 149–166. (in Russ.).

Chechushkov I. V., Yakimov A. S., Dakovich G. [Architectural and planning design of Sintashta-Petrovka settlements and the issue of the Bronze Age warfare]. Rossiyskaya arkheologiya [Russian Archaeology], 2018, no. 3, pp. 75–92. DOI: 10.31857/S086960630001661-6 (in Russ.).

Coles J. M. Ancient Wood, Woodworking and Wooden Houses (Contribution to the ESF Workshop on the Reconstruction of Wooden Buildings from the Prehistoric and Early Historic Period in Århus, Denmark in 1987), euroREA. Journal for (Re)construction and Experiment in Archaeology, 2006, no. 3, pp. 50–57. (in English).

Drennan R. D., Peterson C. E. Challenges for Comparative Study of Early Complex Societies. The Comparative Archaeology of Complex Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 62–87. (in English).

Epimakhov A. V. [Demographic aspects of sociological reconstructions (based on materials of the Sintashta-Petrovska sites)]. XIII Ural’skoe arkheologicheskoe soveshhanie [13th Ural archaeological meeting]. Ufa: Vostochnyy universitet Publ., 1996, pp. 58–60. (in Russ.).

Erasmus C. J. Monument Building: Some Field Experiments. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 1965, no. 4, pp. 277–301. (in English).

Flannery K. V. The Cultural Evolution of Civilizations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1972, no. 3, pp. 399–426. (in English).

Gening V. F., Zdanovich G. B., Gening V. V. Sintashta: Arkheologicheskie pamyatniki arijskikh plemen Uralo-Kazakhstanskikh stepej [Sintashta: Archaeological sites of the Aryan tribes of the Ural-Kazakhstan steppes]. Chelyabinsk: Yuzhno-Ural’skoe knizhnoe izd-vo Publ., 1992. (in Russ.).

Koryakova L. N., Krauze R., Epimakhov A. V., Sharapova S. V., Panteleyeva S. E., Berseneva N. A., Fornasier J., Kaizer E’., Molchanov I. V., Chechushkov I. V. [Archaeological studies of the Kamenny Ambar (Ol’gino) fortified settlement]. Arkheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii [Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia], 2011, vol. 4, no. 48, pp. 61–74. (in Russ.).

Koryakova L. N., Kuzmina S. A. [Certain specifics of Kamenny Ambar fortified settlement architecture in the context of life style of the South Transuralian population of the early 2nd millennium BC]. Ural’skij istoriceski vestnik [Ural Historical Journal], 2017, no. 1 (54), pp. 92–102. (in Russ.).

Multidisciplinary Investigations of the Bronze Age Settlements in the Southern Trans-Urals (Russia). Bonn: Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, 2013. (in English).

Pickett J., Schreck J. S., Holod R., Rassamakin Y., Halenko O., Woodfin W. Architectural energetics for tumuli construction: The case of the medieval Chungul Kurgan on the Eurasian steppe. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2016, no. 75, pp. 101–114. (in English).

Pozorski T. The Early Horizon Site of Huaca de Los Reyes: Societal Implications. American Antiquity, 1980, vol. 45, iss. 1, pp. 100–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/279663 (in English).

Prikhodko V. E., Ivanov I. V., Zdanovich D. G., Zdanovich G. B., Manakhov D. V., Inubushi K. Arkaim — ukreplennoe poselenie epokhi bronzy stepnogo Zauralya: pochvenno-arkheologicheskie issledovaniya [Arkaim — a fortified settlement of the Bronze Age of the steppe Trans-Urals: soil-archaeological research]. Moscow: ID “Tipografiya Rossel’khozakademii” Publ., 2014. (in Russ.).

Recchia G., Cazzella A. Coppa Nevigata in the Wider Context of Bronze Age Fortified Settlements of South-eastern Italy and the Adriatic Area. Bronze Age Fortresses in Europe. Proceedings of the Second International LOEWE Conference. Bonn: Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, 2019, pp. 81–97. (in English).

Renfrew C. Monuments, Mobilization and Social Organization in Neolithic Wessex. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory. London: Duckworth, 1973, pp. 539–558. (in English).

Semenov S. A. Razvitie tekhniki v kamennom veke [The Development of Technology in the Stone Age]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1968. (in Russ.).

Vinogradov N. B. Drevnee Ust’e. Ukreplennoe poselenie bronzovogo veka v Yuzhnom Zaural’e [Drevnee Ust’ye: a fortified settlement of the Bronze Age in the Southern Trans-Urals]. Chelyabinsk: Abris Publ., 2013. (in Russ.).

Wittfogel K. A. Oriental Despotism: a Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957. (in English).

Zdanovich D. G. Sintashtinskoe obshhestvo: social’nye osnovy “kvazigorodskoy” kul’tury Yuzhnogo Zaural’ya epokhi sredney bronzy [Sintashta society: social foundations of the “quasi-urban” culture of the South Trans-Urals of the Middle Bronze Age]. Chelyabinsk: Izd-vo Chelyabinskogo gos. un-ta Publ., 1997. (in Russ.).

Zdanovich G. B. [“Fortifications”, “fortress” in the archaeology of the Sintashta-Arkaim culture and in the poetic tradition of the Rigveda]. Voprosy arkheologii Urala [Questions of Archaeology of the Urals], 2011, no. 26, pp. 40–63. (in Russ.).


Zdanovich G. B. [Arkaim. Arias in the Urals or a failed civilization]. Arkaim: Issledovaniya. Poiski. Otkrytiya [Arkaim: Research. Search. Discoveries]. Chelyabinsk: Kamennyy Poyas Publ., 1995, pp. 21–42. (in Russ.). 

 
Download in PDF