Issue 2 (67)

IVANOVSKY CHANNEL: EVOLUTION OF THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE AND ITS TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE REFLECTIONS
Year 2020 Number 2(67)
Pages 78-88 Type scientific article
UDC 94(470) BBK 63.3(2)
Authors Yurkin Igor N.
Topic RUSSIA’S CULTURAL LANDSCAPES IN HISTORICAL ASPECT
Summary The article considers the cultural landscape of the Upper Don shores formed under Peter the Great during the construction of Ivanovsky channel and subsequently changed in the process of ongoing anthropogenic intervention. A brief outline of the channel’s history is given. Late (midsecond half of the 20th century) landscape changes due to industrial brown coal mining developed in this territory are taken into account. Cultural activities are considered both as a cause and as a result of the landscape remaking. The author identifies the sources and objectives of the impact on the environment and demonstrates its consequences. The most important anthropogenic factors affecting the transformation of the landscape are considered. The forms of reflection are listed: in the landscape — cultural activity, in the perception of man, in his individual worldview — cultural landscape. Evidence of a conscious perpetuation of historical events (commemoration), including through cultural impact on the landscape, is examined. It is shown how the mass notion of historical events has been changed, including under the influence of their interpretations in fiction (using the example of A. Platonov’s story “Epiphanian gateways”). The cultural landscape is also considered as a historical source: on the material of the Upper Don it is shown what information and how can be obtained in the fi eld study of landscapes. The data of studies conducted during the expeditions along the channel route are presented, in which the author of the article took part.
Keywords Ivanovsky channel, Petrine modernization, natural landscape, cultural landscape, commemoration, historical source, A. Platonov
References

Gapeev A. M., Kononov V. V. [Water transport joints of Russia in 17th–19th centuries]. Zhurnal universiteta vodnykh kommunikatsiy [Journal of the University of water communications], 2009, no. 1, pp. 6–21. (in Russ.).

Kolbovsky E. Yu. Landshaftovedeniye [Landscape science]. Moscow: ITs “Akademiya” Publ., 2006. (in Russ.).

Kopelevich Yu. H. Iogann Anton Gil’denshtedt. 1745–1781 [Johann Anton Güldenstädt. 1745–1781]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1997. (in Russ.).

Mishon V. M., Dvornichenko I. P., Kandybko E. V. [Where the Don began in antiquity and where it begins now]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Geografiya. Geoekologiya [Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Geography. Geoecology], 2000, no. 1, pp. 169–172. (in Russ.).

Neef E. Teoreticheskiye osnovy landshaftovedeniya [Theoretical foundations of landscape science]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1974. (in Russ.).

Svyatoslavsky A. V. Istoriya Rossii v zerkale pamyati. Mekhanizmy formirovaniya istoricheskikh obrazov [History of Russia in the Mirror of Memory. Mechanisms for the formation of historical images]. Moscow: Drevlekhranilishche Publ., 2013. (in Russ.).

Yurkin I. N. [Industrial entrepreneurship of the pre-industrial era and the transformation of landscapes: factors and objects of influence]. Kulikovo pole. Istoricheskiy landshaft. Priroda. Arkheologiya. Istoriya [Kulikovo pole. Historical landscape. Nature. Archaeology. History]. Tula: GUIPP “Tul’skiy poligrafist” Publ., 2003, vol. 2, pp. 324–345. (in Russ.).

Yurkin I. N. Petr Zheleznyy. Petr Velikiy i tul’skiy kray: fakty, gipotezy, dokumenty [Peter Zhelezny. Peter the Great and the Tula region: facts, hypotheses, documents]. Saint Petersburg: Evropeyskiy dom Publ., 2012. (in Russ.).

Yurkin I. N., Kalita S. P. [In search of the beginning of the river Don: from ancient geographers to the authors of the first card]. Vestnik Akademii nauk Chechenskoy respubliki [Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic], 2019, no. 2 (45), pp. 120–125. DOI: 10.25744/vestnik.2019.45.2.020 (in Russ.).

 
Download in PDF