Issue 2 (67)

MEDIA SPACE OF THE MEMORY POLITICS OF THE POLITICAL REPRESSION ERA (on the example of thematic Internet projects)
Year 2020 Number 2(67)
Pages 107-115 Type scientific article
UDC 94(470) BBK 63.3(2):71
Authors Karavaeva Dina N.
Zevako Yulia V.
Topic RUSSIA’S CULTURAL LANDSCAPES IN HISTORICAL ASPECT
Summary The article discusses the main discourses of the politics of memory about the era of political repression that developed in Russia in the 1990–2010s (official, liberal, orthodox). Features of the process of understanding the events of the late 1920s — early 1950s are considered in the concept of “trauma” (S. A. Oushakin, Z. Bogumil) and “post-memory” (M. Hirsch) on the example of thematic Internet projects (virtual Gulag museum, “Immortal Barak”, “Letters of the Enemies of the People”, “Memorial” and “Thomas” websites). Particular attention is given to the analysis of the language of each of them, to the defi nition of semantic constructions through which the memory politics of this era is formulated. Representatives of the liberal approach use virtual space most actively and inventively. Orthodox and offi cial memory politics projects on the era of political repression are characterized by fragmentation, situationalism and optional character. The analysis of thematic Internet projects suggests that the media space of the politics of memory in relation to the political repression era has a great potential, including the formation of coordinated narratives about this era and, accordingly, overcoming collective trauma.
Keywords memory politics of the political repression era, discourses of the memory politics of the political repression era, Internet projects, post-memory, “trauma”
References

Antipov G. A. [From memory to history]. Idei i idealy [Ideas and Ideals], 2012, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 31–48. (in Russ.).

Arthog A. [Order of time. Modes of historicity]. Neprikosnovennyy zapas [The untouchable reserve], 2008, no. 3 (59). Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2008/3/ar3.html (accessed: 23.03.2019). (in Russ.).

Bibikova L. V. [Postmodernism and the Value Crisis of the European Historical Science]. Tetradi po konservatizmu [Essays on conservatism], 2015, no. 3, pp. 59–72. (in Russ.).

Bogumil Z. [Crosses and stones: the Solovetsky symbols in the construction of the memory of the Gulag]. Neprikosnovennyy zapas [The untouchable reserve], 2010, no. 3 (71). Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2010/3/zu3.html (accessed: 03.23.2019). (in Russ.).

Bogumil Z. Stone, Cross and Mask: Searching for Language of Commemoration of the Gulag in the Russian Federation. Polish Sociological Review, 2012, no. 177, pp. 71–90. (in English).

Freeling G., Xaver A. Chelovek — tsvet — prostranstvo. Prikladnaya tsvetopsikhologiya [Man — color — space. Applied color psychology]. Moscow: Stroyizdat Publ., 1973. (in Russ.).

Hirsch M. [What is post-memory]. Available at: http://urokiistorii.ru/article/53287 (accessed: 06.17.2016). (in Russ.).

Huizinga J. Chelovek igrayushchiy. Opyt opredeleniya igrovogo elementa kul’tury [Homo ludens. A study of the play-element in culture]. Saint Petersburg: izd-vo Ivana Limbakha Publ., 2011. (in Russ.).

Kondrashin V. V. [On the state policy of the formation and preservation of historical memory]. Gumanitarnyye nauki. Khronika [Humanities. Chronicle], 2016, no. 2 (38), pp. 236–240. (in Russ.).

Korzina M. I., Kostyuchenko O. A., Lysenko V. A., Lysenko A. A., Mayorov I. S., Patashova M. A. [Modeling the aesthetic website design]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya: yestestvennyye nauki [Bulletin of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Natural sciences], 2013, no. 1, pp. 116–123. (in Russ.).

Lebedeva O. [One past — two memories: a comparative analysis of the expositions of the Museum of The Baltic-White Sea Waterway and the Museum of The Solovki special camp]. Laboratorium: zhurnal sotsial’nykh issledovaniy [Laboratorium: Russian Review of Social Research], 2018, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 134–148. (in Russ.).

Lezina E. [Overcoming the past in a post-totalitarian society as a guarantee of socio-political freedom]. Available at: http://www.cogita.ru/pamyat/kultura-pamyati/teksty-dokladov-konferencii-abmezhdu-pamyatyui-amneziei-sledy-i-obrazy-gulagabb-5-7-noyabrya-2007/lyozina-evgeniya.-preodolenie-proshlogo-vposttotalitarnom-obschestve-kak-garantiya-obschestvenno-politicheskoi-svobody (accessed: 04.10.2019). (in Russ.).

Malinova O. Yu. [The Problem of Politically Suitable Past and Evolution of Official Symbolic Politics in the Post-Soviet Russia]. Politicheskaya kontseptologiya: zhurnal metadistsiplinarnykh issledovaniy [The Political Conceptology: Journal of Metadisciplinary Research], 2013, no. 1, pp. 114–130. (in Russ.).

Miller A. [Politics of memory in Russia. The role of non-state agents]. Gefter [Gefter]. Available at: http://gefter.ru/archive/20967 (accessed: 04.10.2019). (in Russ.).

Miller A. I. [The role of expert communities in the politics of memory in Russia]. Politiya: Analiz. Khronika. Prognoz (zhurnal politicheskoy filosofi i i sotsiologii politiki) [Politeia: Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics], 2013, no. 4 (71), pp. 114–126. (in Russ.).

Oushakin S. [“Should We Breathe This Pain?” On trauma, memory and communities]. Travma: punkty [Trauma: points]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ.. 2009, pp. 5–41. (in Russ.).

Panova N. [Theory of color]. Available at: https://postnauka.ru/faq/73352 (accessed: 03.23.2019). (in Russ.).

Putilova E. G. [The problem of the immortalization of the memory of the victims of political repressions in Russia (1980ies — beginning of 2000ies)]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin], 2010, iss. 9 (99), pp. 71–75. (in Russ.).

Rostovtsev E. A., Sosnitsky D. A. [Main areas of Russian memorial researches]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History], 2014, iss. 2, pp. 106–126. (in Russ.).

Savelyeva I. M., Poletaev A. V. [On the benefi ts and harms of presentism in historiography]. “Tsep’ vremen”: Problemy istoricheskogo soznaniya [“Chain of Times”: Problems of historical consciousness]. Moscow: IVI RAN Publ., 2005, pp. 63–88. (in Russ.).

Seregina E. A. [The state institutionalization of the memory of the Stalinism period in Russia and Latvia. A comparative study]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Literaturovedeniye. Yazykoznaniye. Kul’turologiya [RGGU Bulletin. Series: Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies], 2017, no. 1 (22), pp. 107–115. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gosudarstvennaya-institutsionalizatsiya-pamyati-o-periode-stalinizma-vrossii-i-latvii-sravnitelnyy-analiz/viewer (accessed: 10.04.2019). (in Russ.).

Sneagon T. Dying in the Soviet Gulag for the Future Glory of Mother Russia? Making “Patriotic” Sense of the Gulag in Present-Day Russia. Cultural and Political Imaginaries in Putin’s Russia. Amsterdam: Brill, 2019, pp. 105–140. (in English).

Strelova O. Yu. [History classroom — still “a field of battle for the past”, as “memory wars” rage on]. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Problems of Modern Education], 2012, no. 6, pp. 83–98. (in Russ.).

Ushakin S. [“Can We Breathe This Pain?” About trauma, memory and communities]. Travma: punkty [Trauma: points]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ.. 2009, pp. 5–41. (in Russ.).

Vdovina T. V. [Visual Studies: Basic Methods of Research]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology], 2012, no. 1, pp. 16–26. (in Russ.).

Zemskov V. N. [Extends of political repressions in the USSR: against the speculative and mythological constructions]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN [Izvestiya of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2012, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 79–88. (in Russ.). 

 
Download in PDF