DISCOURSE OF THE EXTREME IN THE MODERN LITERATURE OF THE URALS | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | 2020 | Number | 3(68) |
Pages | 82-89 | Type | scientific article |
UDC | 82(470.5) | BBK | 83(235.55) |
Authors | Snigireva Tatiana A. Vepreva Irina T. |
Topic | DISCOURSE OF THE EXTREME IN LITERATURE AND ART |
Summary | According to the authors of the article, works of fiction that introduce shocking ideas into aesthetic reality fit into the general contemporary discourse of the extreme. Literary texts marked by the extreme are based on the principles of taboos violation which are expressed in the space of creativity as an invasion of forbidden topics, a rethinking of the concept of good and evil, a deviation from the norm of any type (from moral and ethical to linguistic). The material for the analysis is the modern Ural writers’ works of various genre-generic forms: a book of poems “The Gospel of Lucifer” by A. Vavilov (2019), a novel “Department” by A. Salnikov (2018), a play “Claustrophobia” by K. Kostenko (2003). The paper shows how the category of the extreme manifests itself at all levels of the text: from problemthematic (total alienation from traditional norms of life, identity crisis) to specific methods of world modeling associated with the image of the impaired consciousness of a modern person (zoomorphic code, dead-end space, obligatory motives of aggression) and linguistic extremism, based on prison and militaristic vocabulary, on taboo lexical units of the body bottom. Despite genre-generic difference of the works selected for the analysis, there is a similarity of the methods of depicting modern reality and the worldview of a person within the framework of everyday life combined not only by the extremely unusual (i. e., extreme) but also beyond the limits of the allowable and permissible. This poetics includes a lot of grotesque methods of amplification and redundancy with the help of which the recognizable features of modern reality are sharpened and depicted. | ||
Keywords | literature of Urals, A. Vavilov, K. Kostenko, A. Salnikov, fiction discourse of the extreme, alienation, mortal code, zoomorphism, poetics, linguistic extremism | ||
References |
Bahtin M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura Publ., 1972. (in Russ.). Barkovskaya N. V. [Adopted children of culture: traditions of Boris Poplavsky in modern Ural poetry]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Gumanitarnyye nauki [Izvestia. Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2. Humanities and Arts], 2013, vol. 15, no. 4 (120), pp. 279–289. (in Russ.). Hall E. T. The Hidden Dimension. New York: Anchor Books, 1969. (in English). Hapaeva D. [Death as fun]. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie [New Literary Review], 2019, no. 5 (159), pp. 54–70. (in Russ.). Kopnina G. A. Rechevoe manipulirovanie: uch. posob. 3-e izd. [Speech manipulation: study guide 3rd ed.]. Moscow: Flinta; Nauka Publ., 2010. (in Russ.). Kuper J. Enciklopediya simvolov [Encyclopedia of symbols]. Moscow: Associaciya Duhovnogo Edineniya “Zolotoy Vek” Publ., 1995. (in Russ.). Lihachev D. S. Istoricheskaya poetika russkoy literatury: Smekh kak mirovozzrenie i dr. raboty [Historical poetics of Russian literature: Laughter as a worldview and other works]. Sant Peterburg: Aleteyya Publ., 1999. (in Russ.). Raspopova T. A. [Verbal means of kindling of international enmity and hatred in texts of modern massmedia]. Ezhegodnik NII fundamental’nyh i prikladnyh issledovaniy [Yearbook of the research Institute for basic and applied research], 2011, no. 1 (2), pp. 139–154. (in Russ.). Skovorodnikov A. P. [Linguistic necrophilia in modern Russian public discourse]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Ivzestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University], 2019, no. 1 (134), pp. 204–207. (in Russ.). Snigireva T. A. [The “Ural sound scale” in the poetry of Alexander Vavilov]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Gumanitarnyye nauki [Izvestia. Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2. Humanities and Arts], 2016, vol. 18, no. 1 (148), pp. 85–96. DOI: 10.15826/izv2.2016.1.007 (in Russ.). Tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language] Moscow: Gos. in-t “Sov. entsikl.”; OGIZ; Gos. izd-vo inostr. i nats. slov Publ., 1940, vol. IV. (in Russ.). Tolkovyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka s vklyucheniem svedeniy o proiskhozhdenii slov [Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language with the inclusion of information on the origin of words]. Moscow: ITs “Azbukovnik” Publ., 2007. (in Russ.). Toshchenko Zh. T. [The trauma of society: between evolution and revolution (experience of sociological theorizing)]. Sociologiya i obshchestvo: social’noe neravenstvo i social’naya spravedlivost’: materialy V Vseross. sotsiologicheskogo kongressa [Sociology and society: social inequality and social justice: materials of the 5th All-Russian Sociological Congress]. Moscow: Rossiyskoye obshchestvo sotsiologov Publ., 2016, pp. 5952–5966. (in Russ.). Volkova Ya. A. Destruktivnoe obshchenie v kognitivno-diskursivnom aspekte [Destructive communication in the cognitive-discursive aspect]. Volgograd: VGSPU “Peremena” Publ., 2014. (in Russ.). Vorontsova T. A. Rechevaya agressiya: vtorzhenie v kommunikativnoe prostranstvo [Speech aggression: intrusion into the communicative space]. Izhevsk: ID “Udmurtskiy universitet” Publ., 2006. (in Russ.). Vygovskaya D. G. [Extremism in consciousness of different generations of Russians]. Yazyki. Kul’tury. Perevod [Languages. Cultures. Translation], 2015, no. 1, pp. 66–73. (in Russ.). Yazyk vrazhdy i yazyk soglasiya v sociokul’turnom kontekste sovremennosti [The language of hostility and the language of consent in the socio-cultural context of modernity]. Ekaterinburg: UrGU Publ., 2006. (in Russ.). Zhelvis V. I. Pole brani. Skvernoslovie kak social’naya problema v yazykah i kul’turah mira [Field of battle. Profanity as a social problem in the world’s languages and cultures]. Moscow: Ladomir Publ., 2001. (in Russ.). |
||
Download in PDF |