Issue 4 (69)
| “IT’S BETTER WHEN IT’S DONE FOR EVERYONE”: THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE SOCIAL IN THE COMPREHENSION OF DEATH IN L. YA. GINSBURG’S NOTES OF THE 1920–1940s | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2020 | Number | 4(69) |
| Pages | 127-135 | Type | scientific article |
| UDC | 82-94 | BBK | 83.3(2)+84(2) |
| Authors | Malysheva Svetlana Yu. |
Topic | THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE SOCIAL IN EGO-DOCUMENTS |
| Summary | The article considers how during the 1920–1940s the problems of death, finality of human existence, immortality, postmortem ritual, guilt and repentance were thought through and developed by the outstanding Russian literary critic and thinker L. Yŕ. Ginzburg in the interesting and peculiar forms of ego-documents. The borderline nature of genre of her notes and autobiographical “narratives” — between ego-documents and literature — have led to a close interweaving in her reflections of personal, social and historical experience, as well as the intellectual tradition of thinking about the finitude of life and contributed to the creation of an original author’s system of ideas about death. The article shows the stages of formation of these perceptions correlated with the aspects of death actualized in this or that period of Soviet history in the 1920–1940s. From the reflection of the mid-1920s on the “lightness” and unremarkableness of death, a reverse side of the devaluation of life, Ginzburg came in the second half of the 1930s to the necessity of conceptual thinking about death, without which understanding the meaning of life was impossible. Experience of the war and blockade fills this reflection with an understanding of the nature of heroism and heroic death (as the only possible freedom in conditions of unfreedom of war), of the mechanisms of the work of grief, guilt and remorse as a tragic near-death experience in the event of loss of loved ones. The understanding of death, imbued with humanism and sociality, with a sense of experience of common human connections, has become an essential part of Ginzburg’s concept of human life in the postindividualist era. | ||
| Keywords | historical thanatology, death, funeral rite, suicide, L. Ya. Ginzburg, ego-documents, blockade of Leningrad | ||
| References |
Hellbeck J. Revolution on My Mind: Writing a Diary under Stalin. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press, 2006. (in English). Istoriia v ego-dokumentakh: Issledovaniia i istochniki [History in Ego-Documents: Research and Sources]. Ekaterinburg: “AsPUr” Publ., 2014. (in Russ.). Lebina N. Sovetskaya povsednevnost’: normy i anomalii. Ot voennogo kommunizma k bol’shomu stilyu [Soviet everyday life: norms and anomalies. From military communism to big style]. Moscow: NLO Publ., 2015. (in Russ.). Malysheva S. Iu. “Na miru krasna”: instrumentalizatsiia smerti v Sovetskoi Rossii [“Beautiful in Public’s Eyes: instrumentalization of death in Soviet Russia]. Moscow: Novyy khronograf Publ., 2019. (in Russ.). Mogil’ner M. B. Mifologiya “podpol’nogo cheloveka”: radikal’nyi mikrokosm v Rossii nachala XX veka kak predmet semioticheskogo analiza [Mythology of the “Underground man”: radical microcosm in early 20th century Russia as a subject of semiotic analysis]. Moscow: NLO Publ., 1999. (in Russ.). Morrissey S. K. Suicide and the Body Politic in Imperial Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. (in English). Pinnow K. M. Lost to the Collective: Suicide and the Promise of Soviet Socialism, 1921–1929. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 2010. (in English). Sklyarov O. N. [“The thought that has made a circle” by Lidiya Ginzburg as a literary and philosophical study]. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Svyato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Filologiya [St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series III: Philology], 2014, no. 4 (39), pp. 46–66. DOI: 10.15382/sturIII201439.46-66 (in Russ.). Tyazhel’nikova V. S. [Communists’ suicides in the 1920s]. Otechestvennaya istoriya [Domestic History], 1998, no. 6, pp. 158–173. (in Russ.). Van Baskirk E. [“Self-Exclusion” as an ethical and aesthetic principle in L. Ya. Ginzburg’s prose]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 2006, no. 5 (81), pp. 261–281. (in Russ.). Van Baskirk E. [Personal and historical experience in the blockade prose of Lydia Ginzburg]. Ginzburg L. Ya. Prokhodyashchie kharaktery: Proza voennykh let. Zapiski blokadnogo cheloveka [Ginzburg L. Ya. Passing characters: war years prose. Notes of the besieged man]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo Publ., 2011, đđ. 506–530. (in Russ.). Van Baskirk E. Proza Lidii Ginzburg: real’nost’ v poiskakh literatury [Lydia Ginzburg’s prose: reality in search of literature]. Moscow: NLO Publ., 2020. (in Russ.). Van Buskirk E. Lydia Ginzburg’s Prose: Reality in Search of Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016. (in English). Zorin A. [Lydia Ginzburg: the experience of “reconciliation with reality”]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 2010, no. 1 (101), pp. 32–51. (in Russ.). |
||
| Download in PDF | |||
