LEGAL REGULATORS OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY IN THE EAST OF RUSSIA (SUMMER 1918 — AUTUMN 1922) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | 2022 | Number | 1(74) |
Pages | 181-189 | Type | scientific article |
UDC | 94(47+57)“1918/1922” | BBK | 63.3(235.55+253+255)61 |
Authors | Rynkov Vadim M. |
Topic | PAGES OF RUSSIA’S POLITICAL HISTORY |
Summary | The article deals with the legal mechanisms of business regulation in the Urals, Siberia and the Far East under anti-Bolshevist governments. The author considers the political and economic context of the Civil War events in the east of Russia. The governments’ policy of restoring the rights of owners and the relative freedom of entrepreneurship, the presence of a network of commercial and industrial organizations, and the presence of a large number of lawyers in the supreme and central governing bodies of the anti-Bolshevist governments became the most important prerequisites for strengthening the role of legal regulators of business activity. In the east of Russia, legal grounds were developed for the continuation of the work of commercial and industrial institutions that had lost contact with their legal owners or parent institutions. The government expended and prolonged powers, replacing the principal and creating a temporary entity with the rights to enter into transactions on behalf of the owner, including the acceptance of financial obligations. The demands of the authorities for the full payment of debts by the owners, including the period when they did not manage their enterprises under the Soviet regime, were perceived as an injustice and an obstacle to the revival of industry, as well as the desire not to subsidize the restoration of production activities, but to credit on commercial terms. But the Civil War forced the authorities to restrict the rights of owners and their representatives to freely dispose of their property. It is crucially important that such restrictions were reversible, and could be lifted after emergency circumstances. The article also presents cases when anti-Bolshevist governments carried out the nationalization of the property of private and cooperative enterprises, and analyzes the reasons for such decisions. | ||
Keywords | East of Russia, anti-Bolshevik governments, commercial and industrial organizations, civil law, powers of attorney, loans, nationalization | ||
References |
Dmitriev N. I. [Economics according to Kolchak: search for development paths]. Ural v sobytiyakh 1917–1920 gg.: aktual’nyye problemy izucheniya (k 80-letiyu prekrashcheniya boyevykh deystviy na Urale). Materialy region. nauch. seminara [The Urals in the events of 1917–1920: actual problems of study (on the 80th anniversary of the cessation of hostilities in the Urals). Materials of the regional sci. seminar]. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinskiy gos. un-t Publ., 1999, pp. 131–151. (in Russ.). Dmitriev N. I. [On the revival of commercial and industrial organizations in the east of Russia in 1918–1919]. Delovaya Rossiya: istoriya i sovremennost’: tezisy II Vseros. zaochnoy nauch. konf. [Business Russia: history and modernity: abstracts of the 2nd All-Russian extramural sci. conf.]. Saint Petersburg: Nestor Publ., 1996, pp. 93–95. (in Russ.). Dmitriev N. I. [The Russian-Czechoslovak Chamber of Commerce and Industry in the Urals during the Russian Civil War (1918–1919)]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Istoriya Rossii [RUDN Journal of Russian History], 2019, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 50–66. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8674-2019-18-1-50-66 (in Russ.). Kalyagin A. V., Paramonov V. E. [Social and economic policy of the All-Russian constituent Assemly at Samara]. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya [Vestnik of Samara State University. History], 1998, no. 1, pp. 66–73. (in Russ.). Kolz A. W. F. British Economic Interests in Siberia during the Russian Civil War, 1918–1920. The Journal of Modern History, 1976, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 483–491. (in English). [“Real” policy of the Provisional Siberian Government]. Belaya armiya. Beloye delo: istoricheskiy nauchnopopulyarnyy al’manakh [White Army. White Affair: historical popular science almanac], 2001, no. 9, pp. 29–41. (in Russ.). Rukosuev E. Yu. [The Yekaterinburg Bureau of the Council of Congresses of the Ural miners in 1917–1919]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Istoriya [Perm University Herald. History], 2014, iss. 4 (27), pp. 84–91. (in Russ.). Rynkov V. M. [Kolchak’s nationalization: Cheremkhov mines in the second half of 1918–1919]. Grazhdanskaya voyna na vostoke Rossii: problemy istorii: Mezhvuz. sbornik nauch. trudov [Civil War in the east of Russia: problems of history: Interuniversity collection of sci. papers]. Novosibirsk: NGU Publ., 2001, pp. 87–108. (in Russ.). Rynkov V. M. [Legal regulation as a tool for political adaptation of the population of the east of Russia to the challenges of the Civil War]. Politicheskaya adaptatsiya naseleniya Sibiri v pervoy treti XX veka: sbornik nauchnykh statey [ Political adaptation of the population of Siberia in the first third of the 20th century: a collection of scientific articles]. Novosibirsk: Parallel’ Publ., 2015, pp. 145–182. (in Russ.). Rynkov V. M. Sotsial’naya politika antibol’shevistskikh rezhimov na vostoke Rossii [Social policy of anti-Bolshevik regimes in the East of Russia]. Novosibirsk: Sibprint Publ., 2008. (in Russ.). Shatsillo M. K. Rossiyskaya burzhuaziya v period Grazhdanskoy voyny i pervyye gody emigratsii (1917 — nachalo 1920 gg.) [The Russian bourgeoisie during the Civil War and the first years of emigration (1917 — early 1920)]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2008. (in Russ.). Smele J. D. Civil War in Siberia: The Anti-Bolshevik Government of Admiral Kolchak 1918–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. (in English). Tsipkin Yu. N. Beloye dvizheniye na Dal’nem Vostoke (1920–1922 gg.) [White movement in the Far East (1920–1922)]. Khabarovsk: KhGPU Publ., 1996. (in Russ.). Zvyagin S. P. Pravookhranitel’naya politika A. V. Kolchaka [Law enforcement policy of A. V. Kolchak]. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat Publ., 2001. (in Russ.). |
||
Download in PDF |