Issue 2 (75)
| “EVERYBODY IS THINKING ABOUT NATURE TODAY”: THE SEARCH FOR AGENCY IN LATE SOVIET ENVIRONMENTAL POSTER | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2022 | Number | 2(75) |
| Pages | 106-114 | Type | scientific article |
| UDC | 94(47)“19”:769.91 | BBK | 63.3(2)634+85 |
| Authors | Rakov Timofey N. Fokin Alexander A. |
Topic | SOVIET ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE |
| Summary | The article analyzes late Soviet posters related to environmental issues and places them in the context of environmental history in the Soviet era. Analyzing the Soviet posters, we can distinguish three distinct stages: 1) nature as an object of human effort; 2) nature as an object in need of protection from individual pests; and 3) nature as a value and subject. This change did not occur by itself but reflected an evolution of the perception of ecology in Soviet society. A close examination of the dynamics of posters reveals that nature was gradually but increasingly endowed with its own agency, maximizing this quality by the time of Perestroika and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Poster authors increasingly allowed the environment to act on behalf of itself. This shift was the result of factors beyond that medium — a crisis of trust in state institutions and in the science that depended on them. In keeping with B. Latour’s thesis, the development of an independent nature image in posters testified to the need for establishing different principles of “politics of nature”, although this need (not perceived as such by its authors) began to be reflected in the “superstructure” and in the sphere of the environment’s representation. The growing importance of ecology, both in the USSR and internationally, called for new answers to global questions. Within the Soviet system, therefore, various power structures sought to develop a language for discussing ecology issues based on Marxist-Leninist principles. | ||
| Keywords | nature, anthropocene, USSR, poster, media, environmental policy | ||
| References |
Bonnell V. Iconography of Power: Soviet Political Posters Under Lenin and Stalin. Berkley: University of Califonia Press, 1999. (in English). Brain S. Song of the forest: Russian forestry and Stalinist environmentalism, 1905–1953. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2011. (in English). Breyfogle N. B. At the Watershed: 1958 and the Beginnings of Lake Baikal Environmentalism. The Slavonic and East European Review, 2015, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 147–180. DOI: 10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.93.1.0147 (in English). Bruno A. Studying the Siberian Anthropocene: An Introduction. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 2021, vol. 48, iss. 3, pp. 257–261. DOI: 10.30965/18763324-bja10044 (in English). Bugaev R., Piskunov M., Rakov T. Footpaths of the Late-Soviet Environmental Turn: The “Forest City” of Novosibirsk’s Akademgorodok as a Sociotechnical Imaginary. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 2021, vol. 48, iss. 3, pp. 289–313. DOI: 10.30965/18763324-bja10043 (in English). Coumel L. A Failed Environmental Turn? Khrushchev’s Thaw and Nature Protection in Soviet Russia. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 2013, vol. 40, iss. 2, pp. 167–189. DOI: 10.1163/18763324-04002002 (in English). Dronin N. M., Francis J. M. Econationalism in Soviet literature. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 2018, vol. 45, iss. 1, pp. 51–72. DOI: 10.1163/18763324-20171260 (in English). Fitzpatrick S. Sryvayte maski! Identichnost’ i samozvanstvo v Rossii XX veka [Tear off the masks! Identity and imposture in twentieth-century Russia]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2011. (in Russ.). Gololobov E. I. The North of Western Siberia in the Socioeconomic Space of the USSR: Shifting Models of Nature Use. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 2021, vol. 48, iss. 3, pp. 262–288. DOI: 10.30965/18763324- bja10042 (in English). Kharkhordin O. V. Oblichat’ i litsemerit’: genealogiya rossiyskoy lichnosti [Reveal and dissimulate: a genealogy of Russian personality]. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo Evropeyskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge Publ., 2016. (in Russ.). Kochetkova E. Baikal Waters: Industrial Development and Institutional Debates, 1950s–1970s. Place and Nature: Essays in Russian Environmental History. Winwick: White Horse Press, 2021, ch. 13, pp. 292–312. (in English). Kovda V. A. Velikiy plan preobrazovaniya prirody [The great plan for the transformation of nature]. Moscow: Izd-vo AN SSSR Publ., 1952. (in Russ.). Latour B. Politiki prirody: kak privit naukam demokratiyu [Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy]. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 2018. (in Russ.). Mazanik A. Environmental Change and the Soviet Media before 1986. Climate Change Discourse in Russia: Past and Present. London; New York: Routledge, 2019, pp. 32–49. (in English). Weiner D. R. A Little Corner of Freedom: Russian Nature Protection from Stalin to Gorbachev. Berkley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press, 1999. (in English). Weiner D. Models of nature: Ecology, Conservation, and Cultural Revolution in Soviet Russia. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000. (in English). Wolfe T. Governing Soviet Journalism: The Press and the Socialist Person after Stalin. Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2005. (in English). Yessimova A. B. [Environmental themes in soviet posters]. Mir Bol’shogo Altaya [The world of the Great Altai], 2019, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 648–660. DOI: 10.31551/2410-2725-2019-5-4-648-660 (in Russ.). Yurchak A. Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne konchilos’. Posledneye sovetskoye pokoleniye [Everything was forever, until it was no more. The last Soviet Generation]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2014. (in Russ.). |
||
| Download in PDF | |||
