Issue 2 (75)
| THE CHILIMKA V SETTLEMENT AND ITS PLACE IN THE NEOLITHIC OF THE WEST SIBERIAN TAIGA ZONE | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2022 | Number | 2(75) |
| Pages | 139-148 | Type | scientific article |
| UDC | 903.3(571.1)“634” | BBK | 63.442.14(253.3) |
| Authors | Dubovtseva Ekaterina N. Klementieva Tatiana Yu. |
Topic | ARCHAEOLOGICAL MOSAIC |
| Summary | Settlements with a similar material culture dominated in the West Siberian taiga zone in the 6th and 5th millennia BC. They are characterized by pottery with rounded bottoms, thin walls and incised ornamentation. In the upper and middle Konda River area and in the basin of the Severnaya Sosva River such pottery is identified as belonging to the Umyt’insky and Chestyjyagsky cultural type, respectively, in the mid-Ob region it relates to the Bystrinsky archaeological culture. The Chilimka V settlement is situated in the lower section of the Konda River basin, on the border of the Bystrinsky and Umyt’insky areas. It was investigated by I. G. Glushkov in 1988. The Chilimka V complex characterized by pottery with rounded bottoms, thin walls and incised ornamentation was defined as a “Chilimkinsky ceramic type”. The genesis of this type, according to I. G. Glushkov and T. N. Sobolnikova, is connected with migrations of Kelterminar population to the taiga zone in the 3rd millennium BC. The fundamental question of the definition of the “Chilimkinsky ceramic type”, which arose during the development of the modern cultural and chronological scheme of the Neolithic, required to re-examine the materials of the excavations. We have established that the site is multi-layered. The Neolithic dwelling was penetrated by several late Neolithic burials. In addition, some shards of the Bronze Age were discovered. The analysis of Neolithic ceramics demonstrates its objective similarity to both Umyt’insky type and Bystrinsky culture. Based on this, it is suggested to combine the settlements of these types into one cultural-chronological horizon of the taiga Neolithic of the north of Western Siberia. | ||
| Keywords | Neolithic, Western Siberia, cultural-chronological horizon, ceramics, Chilimkinsky type, Umyt’insky type, Bystrinsky archaeological culture, Chestyjyagsky type, burials | ||
| References |
Bobrov V. V., Marochkin A. G., Yurakova A. Yu. [Avtodrom 2-a Late Neolithic (Artyn culture) site in the Baraba forest-steppe, Western Siberia]. Arkheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii [Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia], 2017, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 49–61. DOI: 10.17746/1563-0102.2017.45.1.049-061 (in Russ.). Dubovtseva E. N. Traditsii keramicheskogo proizvodstva v neolite severa Zapadnoy Sibiri: kand. diss. [Traditions of ceramic production in the Neolithic of the North of Western Siberia: Diss. Cand.]. Ekaterinburg, 2021. (in Russ.). Dubovtseva E. N., Kosinskaya L. L. [Chronology and periodization of the Neolithic of the taiga zone of Western Siberia]. Tverskoy arkheologicheskiy sbornik [Tver archaeological collection]. Tver: Triada Publ., 2021, iss. 12, pp. 11–29. (in Russ.). Glushkov I. G. [Reconstruction and modeling of the Neolithic dwelling (based on the materials of the Chilimka V settlement)]. Igor’ Gennad’yevich Glushkov: sbornik izbrannykh statey [Igor Gennadievich Glushkov: a collection of selected articles]. Surgut: RIO SurGPU Publ., 2011, part 2, pp. 153–166. (in Russ.). Glushkov I. G., Sobolnikova T. N. [Pottery traditions of the lower Konda area in the Neolithic]. Problemy neolita–eneolita yuga Zapadnoy Sibiri [Problems of the Neolithic–Eneolithic in the south of Western Siberia]. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat Publ., 1999, pp. 108–122. (in Russ.). Klementieva T. Yu., Trufanov A. Ya. [Neolithic cultural and chronological complexes of the Bolshaya Umytia 109 settlement]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Istoriya [Perm University Herald. History], 2019, iss. 1 (44), pp. 20–33. DOI: 10.17072/2219-3111-2019-1-20-33 (in Russ.). Klementieva T. Yu., Kruzement S. A., Pogodin A. A. [Neolithic settlements in the north of Western Siberia (Konda river basin): field studies of 2007–2011]. Pervobytnyye drevnosti Evrazii: k 60-letiyu A. N. Sorokina [Primitive antiquities of Eurasia: to the 60th anniversary of A. N. Sorokin]. Moscow: IA RAN Publ., 2012, pp. 499–526. (in Russ.). Klementieva T. Yu., Pogodin A. A. [Burial practices of the population from the Konda River Basin in the Mesolithic and Neolithic Periods]. Samarskiy nauchnyy vestnik [Samara Journal of Science], 2020, vol. 9, no. 1 (30), pp. 131–141. DOI: 10.17816/snv202091202 (in Russ.). Klementieva T. Yu., Pogodin A. A. [Stratification of Neolithic ceramic complexes in the Konda River Basin]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: istoriya, filologiya [Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: History and Philology], 2020, vol. 19, no. 7: Archaeology and Ethnography, pp. 216–228. DOI: 10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-7-216-228 (in Russ.). Poseleniye Bystryy Kul’yogan 66: pamyatnik epokhi neolita Surgutskogo Priob’ya [ The Bystry Kulyogan 66 settlement: a Neolithic site of the Surgut Ob region]. Ekaterinburg; Surgut: Ural’skoye izd-vo Publ., 2006. (in Russ.). Sobolnikova T. N. [Reconstruction of the pottery traditions of the Neolithic settlement Chilimka V]. Tret’i istoricheskiye chteniya pamyati Mikhaila Petrovicha Gryaznova: Doklady Vseross. nauch. konf. [Third historical readings in memory of Mikhail Petrovich Gryaznov: Reports of the All-Russian Sci. Conf.]. Omsk: OmGU Publ., 1995, part 2, pp. 65–67. (in Russ.). Sobolnikova T. N. Goncharnyye traditsii nizov’yev Kondy v epokhu neolita–ranney bronzy: kand. diss. [Pottery traditions of the lower Konda region in the Neolithic–Early Bronze Age: Diss. Cand.]. Surgut, 1998. (in Russ.). Tupakhina O. S., Tupakhin D. S. [The Gorny Samotnel-1 Eneolithic settlement: materials and research]. Arkheologiya Arktiki [Archaeology of Arctic]. Omsk: Omskblankizdat Publ., 2018, iss. 5. (in Russ.). Vasiliev E. A. [Excavations of the Ches-Tyi-Yag Neolithic settlement in the Subpolar Urals]. Khanty-Mansiyskiy avtonomnyy okrug v zerkale proshlogo [Khanty-Mansiisk Autonomous Okrug in the mirror of the past]. Tomsk; Khanty-Mansiysk: izd-vo Tom. un-ta Publ., 2004, iss. 2, pp. 296–301. (in Russ.). Vasiliev E. A. [On the problem of Central Asian — West Siberian connections in the Neolithic era]. Problemy khronologii i periodizatsii arkheologicheskikh pamyatnikov Yuzhnoy Sibiri. Tezisy dokladov k vsesoyuznoy nauch. konf. [Problems of chronology and periodization of archaeological sites in South Siberia. Abstracts of reports for the all-Union sci. conf.]. Barnaul: Topchikhinskaya tipografiya Publ., 1991, pp. 31–33. (in Russ.). Vinogradov A. V. [Archaeological research at the Kolungtotytor 1 settlement in the Nefteyugansk district of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra in 2017]. Khanty-Mansiyskiy avtonomnyy okrug v zerkale proshlogo [Khanty-Mansiisk Autonomous Okrug in the mirror of the past]. Tomsk; Khanty-Mansiysk: izd-vo Tom. un-ta Publ., 2018, iss. 16, pp. 295–312. (in Russ.). |
||
| Download in PDF | |||
