Issue 3 (76)
| CHANGES OF TEMPORAL REGIMES AND CONTRADICTORY IMAGES OF THE NATIONAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2022 | Number | 3(76) |
| Pages | 24-33 | Type | scientific article |
| UDC | 930.2 | BBK | 63.1(0) |
| Authors | Ionov Igor N. |
Topic | CULTURAL PRACTICES: LIMITS OF PERCEPTION AND TRANSFERENCE STRATEGIES |
| Summary | The article describes the phenomenon of interference of different cultural practices broadcast in space and time: temporal regimes, images of time as a sphere of possible stories at a given period, and images associated with national self-consciousness and nationalism. The measure of the connection is analyzed between the progressive change in the perception of time described by R. Koselleck, when expectations are separated from experience, and the formation of national self-consciousness at the end of the 18th–19th centuries, as well as between the post-progressive transition from “solid” to “liquid” time described by Z. Bauman and the transformation of national identity into diverse forms of collective self-identifications, self-understandings and identity politics at the end of the 20th−21st centuries. The role in these processes of the transforming attitude to the time of the embodiment of the meaning of history ( airos) is considered: from the unchanging, general and exclusive, associated with the life path of Christ and the idea of the Second Coming, to the changing, multiple and exclusive (the progress of civilization in a given country as airos) and beyond, in the conditions of relativization of the “civilization” concept — to interacting inclusive senses of time, multi-temporality of connected histories or histoire croisée corresponding to multi-level ways of self-identification of the population (synaxis or co-existence, conciliar time). It is these temporal structures that create the prerequisites, first for the creation and strengthening of national self-consciousness, and then for its erosion. | ||
| Keywords | “solid” time, “liquid” time, multitemporality, airos, synaxis, self-identification, nation, methodological nationalism, identity politics, glocalization, exclusive, inclusive | ||
| References |
Asmolov A. G. Psychology of Modernity: Challenges of Uncertainity, Complexity, and Diversity. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/14510720/Psychology_of_Modernity_Challenges_of_Uncertainity_ Complexity_and_Diversity?auto=download (accessed: 15.03.2022). (in English). Bauman Z. Retrotopiya [Retrotopia]. Moscow: VTsIOM Publ., 2019. (in Russ.). Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost’ [Liquid modernity]. Saint Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2008. (in Russ.). Beck U. Kosmopoliticheskoye mirovozzreniye [The Cosmopolitan Vision]. Moscow: Tsentr issledovaniy postindustrial’nogo obshchestva Publ., 2008. (in Russ.). Brubaker R. Etnichnost’ bez grupp [Ethnicity without groups]. Moscow: NIU “Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki” Publ., 2012. (in Russ.). Grinfeld L. Natsionalizm. Pyat’ putey k sovremennosti [Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity]. Moscow: PER SE Publ., 2008. (in Russ.). Huntington S. Kto my? Vyzovy amerikanskoy natsional’noy identichnosti [Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity]. Moscow: AST, Tranzitkniga Publ., 2004. (in Russ.). Ionov I. N. [“Process of civilization”: unification of behavior and diversification of identities]. Fenomen unifikatsii v istorii [Phenomenon of unification in history]. Moscow: IVI RAN Publ., 2019, pp. 301–320. (in Russ.). Ionov I. N. [Games with time: Russian images of “Another Europe”]. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social sciences and Contemporary World], 2019, no. 4, pp. 158–173. DOI: 10.31857/ S086904990005823-7 (in Russ.). Ionov I. N. [The theory of cultural transfer of Michel Espagne and the transdisciplinary analysis of civilizational ideas]. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social sciences and Contemporary World], 2020, no. 1, pp. 148–163. DOI: 10.31857/S086904990008520-4 (in Russ.). Ionov I. N. Mirovaya istoriya v global’nyy vek: Novoye istoricheskoye soznaniye [World History in the Global Age: New Historical Consciousness]. Moscow: Akvilon Publ., 2015. (in Russ.). Ionov I. N. Tsivilizatsionnoye soznaniye i istoricheskoye znaniye: problemy vzaimodeystviya [Civilizational consciousness and historical knowledge: problems of interaction]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2007. (in Russ.). Jordheim H. [Multiple time and stratigraphies of history]. Logos [Logos], 2021, vol. 31, no. 4 (143), pp. 95–118. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2021-4-95-116 (in Russ.). Khondker H. H. Glocalization as Globalization: Evolution of a Sociological Concept. Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology, 2004, vol. 1, no. 2, July, pp. 12–20. (in English). Sorokin P. [The Crisis of Our Age]. Sorokin P. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Sorokin P. Man. Civilization. Society]. Moscow: Politizdat Publ., 1992, pp. 427–504. (in Russ.). Sorokin P. Sotsial’naya i kul’turnaya dinamika: Issledovaniye izmeneniy v bol’shikh sistemakh iskusstva, istiny, etiki, prava, i obshchestvennykh otnosheniy [Social and cultural dynamics: A Study of Change in Major Systems of Art, Truth, Ethics, Law and Social Relationships]. Saint Petersburg: RKhGI Publ., 2000. (in Russ.). Tennis F. Obshchnost’ i obshchestvo. Osnovnyye ponyatiya chistoy sotsiologii [Community and society. Basic concepts of pure sociology]. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’ Publ., 2002. (in Russ.). Tillich P. [Kairos]. Tillikh P. Izbrannoye. Teologiya kul’tury [Tillich P. Selected works. Theology of culture]. Moscow: Yurist Publ., 1995, pp. 216–235. (in Russ.). Troeltsch E. Istorizm i yego problemy. Logicheskaya problema filosofii istorii [Historicism and its problems. The logical problem of the philosophy of history]. Moscow: Yurist Publ., 1994. (in Russ). Yak B. Natsionalizm i moral’naya psikhologiya obshchestva [Nationalism and the moral psychology of community]. Moscow: Institut Gaydara Publ., 2017. (in Russ.). |
||
| Download in PDF | |||
