Issue 3 (76)

THE CONCEPT OF A JUST WAR IN RUSSIAN SOCIO-POLITICAL DISCOURSE (1914–1916)
Year 2022 Number 3(76)
Pages 112-120 Type scientific article
UDC 94(47)“1914/1916” BBK 63.3(2)534
Authors Porshneva Olga S.
Topic METHODOLOGY OF THE “HISTORY OF CONCEPTS”: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE
Summary The article analyzes the representations of the Russian socio-political discourse of 1914–1916, dedicated to the justification of the First World War as a just war on the part of Russia and its Allies. It considers the role of the factors that shaped the image of a just war in the minds of the European political and intellectual elite and the younger generation, as well as the emergence of the idea of “spirituality” of war as the basis for its legitimation. The author stresses the influence of the international conventions on the laws and customs of war on the image of a just war in Russia as well as the specifics of the socio-cultural situation at the turn of the 20th century, which made it difficult to conduct ideological and psychological preparation for world clash that could affect the mass consciousness. The image of a just war began to take shape in Russia after the country entered the conflict and was based on the idea of a defensive war against an external aggressor. The fact that Germany was the first to declare war on Russia, the realities of bloody confrontation contributed to the formation and broadcast the ideas about the “Second Patriotic War”. The concept of the “Second Patriotic War”, which appealed to historical memory, became the embodiment of the idea of a just war in the 1914–1915 Russian socio-political discourse. An important component of the image of a just war in Russia was the notions of the spiritual and religious sense of confrontation. They were embodied in ideas about the implementation of the sacred mission of liberating Europe and the world from “Germanism”, the protection of the Slavs, the “struggle for truth”, the affirmation of the renewed ideal of “Holy Russia”. The ideas of a “holy war against Germanism” got embedded in the discourse of the press into the system of ideas about the fairness of the goals and objectives of the Allies. Another basis for the legitimacy of war was the concept embodied in the slogan “the war to end all wars”. The influential concept of Entente propaganda received a wide response in the Russian liberal and democratic press, which interpreted the meaning of the world conflict in a political and legal terms. The war was seen as a way to establish a new system of international relations based on the rule of the “force of law” as opposed to the “law of force” personified by Germany. Illusions about the possibility of establishing “eternal peace” after the war were widely broadcast in the press, becoming an element of ideas about a just struggle for a better future of mankind. The notions about “German atrocities” widely broadcast by propaganda in the Entente countries were important element of the justification of violence against the enemy and legitimization of the war. In Russia, despite the enemy’s violation of international conventions governing conducting the war and the presence of this topic in the press, the image of “German atrocities” did not play the significant role in socio-political discourse in comparison with the Entente countries.
Keywords Russia, First World War, just war concept, socio-political discourse, legitimization of violence
References

Agamben J. Homosacer. Suverennaya vlast’ i golaya zhizn’ [Homosacer. Sovereign power and bare life]. Moscow: Evropa Publ., 2011. (in Russ.).

Astashov A. B. [Violation of war laws and war traditions on the Russian front of World War I (on materials of the Russian extraordinary commission of inquiry)]. Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya [Modern and Current History Journal], 2014, no. 2, pp. 35–46. (in Russ.).

Astashov A. B. Russkiy front v 1914 — nachale 1917 goda: voyennyy opyt i sovremennost’ [Russian front in 1914 — early 1917: military experience and modernity]. Moscow: Novyy khronograf Publ., 2014. (in Russ.).

Comparative just war theory: an introduction to international perspectives. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2019. (in English).

Davis B. Experience, Identity, and Memory: The Legacy of World War I. The Journal of Modern History, 2003, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 111–131. DOI: 10.1086/377750 (in English).

Demm E. Propaganda at Home and Abroad. 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Available at: https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/propaganda_at_home_and_abroad (accessed: 04.01.2022) (in English).

Eyffinger A. The 1899 Hague Peace Conference. “The Parliament of Man, the Federation of the World”. Hague; London; Boston: Springer, 1999. (in English).

Ferguson N. The Pity of War. London: Allen Lane, 1998. (in English).

Fox J. Making Sense of the War. 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Available at: https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/making_sense_of_the_war (accessed: 15.12.2021) (in English).

Horne J., Kramer A. German Atrocities 1914. A History of Denial. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001. (in English).

Hubertus F. J. Patriotic Culture in Russia during World War I. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995. (in English).

Jelavich P. German culture in the Great War. European culture in the Great War: The Arts, Entertainment and Propaganda, 1914–1918. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 32–57. (in English).

Lasswell G. Tekhnika propagandy v mirovoy voyne [Propaganda Technique in the World War]. Moscow; Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoye izdatel’stvo Publ., 1929. (in Russ.).

Lieven D. Navstrechu ognyu. Imperiya, voyna i konets tsarskoy Rossii [Towards the flame. Empire, war and the end of Tsarist Russia]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2017. (in Russ.).

Malinova O. Yu. [The First World War and the Redefinition of the “West”]. Trudy po rossiyevedeniyu [Proceedings of Russian Studies]. Moscow: INION RAN Publ., 2009, iss. 1, pp. 205–233. (in Russ.).

Marquis A. G. Words as Weapons: Propaganda in Britain and Germany During the First World War. Journal of Contemporary History, 1978, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 467–498. (in English).

McMeekin S. The Russian Origin of the First World War. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011. (in English).

Mir/Peace: Al’ternativy voyne ot antichnosti do kontsa vtoroy mirovoy voyny. Antologiya [Peace/MIR: an Anthology of Historic Alternatives to War]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1993. (in Russ.).

Petrone K. Family, Masculinity, and Heroism in Russian War Posters of the First World War. Borderlines. Gender and Identities in War and Peace, 1870–1930. New York: Routledge, 1998, pp. 95–120. (in English).

Quataert J. H. International Law and the Laws of War. 1914–1918-online. International Encyclopedia of the First World War. Available at: https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/international_law_and_ the_laws_of_war (accessed: 19.01.2022) (in English).

Wohl R. The Generation of 1914. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979. (in English).

 
Download in PDF