Issue 3 (76)
| IDEOLOGICAL ORIENTATION OF THE “NATURAL SCIENCES” CONCEPT IN THE MID-1950S SOVIET HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE DECEMBRIST MOVEMENT | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2022 | Number | 3(76) |
| Pages | 121-130 | Type | scientific article |
| UDC | 930(47)“1950” | BBK | 63.1(2)631 |
| Authors | Kamenev Evgeny V. |
Topic | METHODOLOGY OF THE “HISTORY OF CONCEPTS”: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE |
| Summary | The article examines culturally determined meanings of the “natural sciences” concept in the mid-1950s Soviet historiography of the Decembrists. The theoretical and methodological basis of the work is connotative semiotics, developed by the French semiologist Roland Barthes. It is shown that the concept of natural sciences in the Soviet historiography of Decembrism has not only a direct denotative meaning, referring to the activity of obtaining verified knowledge about nature. This concept within the Soviet culture of the mid-20th century had an additional connotative semantic level. The narrative of Soviet historians about the study of nature by members of secret societies connoted, within the Soviet cultural code, the idea of the undoubted revolutionary nature of the Decembrists. Thanks to these connotations, the main goal of the Soviet historical narrative was achieved — the confirmation of Lenin’s thesis about the Decembrists as the first Russian revolutionaries who started the work that the Bolsheviks had completed. The study of the connotative semantics of the concept of natural sciences based on the semiotic approach allows us to speak about the mechanism of the conceptualization of Decembrism in Soviet historiography. Conceptualization was carried out at the level of a secondary sign system due to intertextual connections. The historical narrative through the signs of the active subject, applied aspect of natural science research, materialism, enlightenment, atheism was correlated with texts precedent for Soviet culture. Due to these correlations, the story about the Decembrists acquired an additional semantic level. The theoretical and methodological apparatus of semiotics is quite applicable to the history of concepts, since it allows reading semantics at all levels of the text — both denotative and connotative. Semiotics provides precise tools for analyzing the semantics of concepts in the context of their parent culture. | ||
| Keywords | The article examines culturally determined meanings of the “natural sciences” concept in the mid-1950s Soviet historiography of the Decembrists. The theoretical and methodological basis of the work is connotative semiotics, developed by the French semiolo | ||
| References |
Aleksandrov A. D. [Lenin’s dialectics and mathematics]. Priroda [Nature], 1951, no. 1, pp. 5–14. (in Russ.). Anichkov N. N. [About some successes and tasks of the Soviet medical science]. Priroda [Nature], 1953, no. 2, pp. 3–7. (in Russ.). Ankersmit F. Istoriya i tropologiya: Vzlet i padeniye metafory [History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor]. Moscow: Kanon+ Publ., 2009. (in Russ.). Barthes R. [Elements of Semiology]. Nulevaya stepen’ pis’ma [Writing degree zero]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2008, pp. 275–352. (in Russ.). Barthes R. [Rhetoric of the Image]. Izbrannyye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika [Selected Works. Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1989, pp. 297–318. (in Russ.). Barthes R. [Textual analysis of a tale by Edgar Poe]. Izbrannyye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika [Selected Works. Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1989, pp. 424–461. (in Russ.). Barthes R. S/Z. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., 2001. (in Russ.). Breisach E. On the Future of History: The Postmodernist challenge and its aftermath. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 2003. (in English). Eco U. Rol’ chitatelya. Issledovaniya po semiotike teksta [The Role of the Reader. Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts]. Moscow: RGGU Publ., 2005. (in Russ.). Gabov G. Obshchestvenno-politicheskiye i filosofskiye vzglyady dekabristov [Socio-political and philosophical views of the Decembrists]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat Publ., 1954. (in Russ.). Iggers G. Historiography in the Twentieth Century — From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge. Hanover; London: Wesleyan University Press, 1997. (in English). Istoriya Vsesoyuznoy kommunisticheskoy partii (bol’shevikov). Kratkiy kurs [History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks). Short Course]. Moscow: OGIZ — Gospolitizdat Publ., 1946. (in Russ.). Koselleck R. [Introduction (Einleitung)]. Slovar’ osnovnykh istoricheskikh ponyatiy: izbrannyye stat’i: v 2 t. [Dictionary of Basic Historical Concepts: Selected articles: in 2 vols.]. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye Publ., 2014, vol. 1, pp. 23–44. (in Russ.). Kosikov G. [Ideology. Connotation. Text]. Bart R. S/Z [Barthes R. S/Z]. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., 2001, pp. 7–22. (in Russ.). Kosikov G. K. [Roland Barthes — semiologist, literary critic]. Bart R. Nulevaya stepen’ pis’ma [Barthes R. Writing degree zero]. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2008, pp. 5–50. (in Russ.). Kovalenskaya N. N. [Decembrist artist F. P. Tolstoy]. Ocherki iz istorii dvizheniya dekabristov [Essays on the history of the Decembrist movement]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat Publ., 1954, pp. 516–560. (in Russ.). Lotman Yu. M. [Abstracts to the problem “Art in a number of modeling systems”]. Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury i iskusstva [Articles on the semiotics of culture and art]. Saint Petersburg: Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2002, pp. 274–294. (in Russ.). Lotman Yu. M. [Culture and information]. Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury i iskusstva [Articles on the semiotics of culture and art]. Saint Petersburg: Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2002, pp. 143–153. (in Russ.). Lotman Yu. M. [Semiotics of culture and the concept of text]. Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury i iskusstva [Articles on the semiotics of culture and art]. Saint Petersburg: Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2002, pp. 84–90. (in Russ.). Lotman Yu. M. [Stage and painting as coding devices of human cultural behavior at the beginning of the 19th century]. Izbrannyye stat’i v 3-kh tomakh [Selected articles in 3 vols]. Tallinn: Aleksandra Publ., 1992, vol. 1, pp. 287–295. (in Russ.). Maksimov A. A. [Lenin and natural science]. Priroda [Nature], 1949, no. 1, pp. 3–14. (in Russ.). Maksimov A. A. [Lenin and the crisis of natural science in the era of imperialism]. Pod znamenem marksizma [Under the banner of Marxism], 1931, no. 1–2, pp. 12–44. (in Russ.). Nechkina M. V. Dvizheniye dekabristov: v 2 t. [Movement of the Decembrists: in 2 vols]. Moscow: Izd-vo AN SSSR Publ., 1955, vol. 1. (in Russ.). Nikandrov P. F. Mirovozzreniye P. I. Pestelya [Worldview of P. I. Pestel]. Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU Publ., 1955. (in Russ.). Oldenburg S. F. [Lenin and science]. Lenin. Chelovek — myslitel’ — revolyutsioner [Lenin. Man — thinker — revolutionary]. Moscow: Direkt-media Publ., 2014, pp. 433–434. (in Russ.). Piégay-Gros N. Vvedeniye v teoriyu intertekstual’nosti [Introduction to the theory of intertextuality]. Moscow: LKI Publ., 2008. (in Russ.). Repina L. P. [“A sign accessible to our senses”, or Historians in search of epistemological arguments]. Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, 2019, no. 2 (26), pp. 3–14. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu19.2019.201 (in Russ.). Shchipanov I. Ya. [Socio-political and philosophical views of the Decembrists]. Izbrannyye sotsial’no-politicheskiye i filosofskiye proizvedeniya dekabristov: v 3 t. [Selected socio-political and philosophical works of the Decembrists: in 3 vols.]. Moscow: Gospolitizdat Publ., 1951, vol. 1, pp. 5–91. (in Russ.). Timofeev D. V. [Methodology of the history of concepts in the context of the history of pre-revolutionary Russia: prospects and application of principles]. Dialog so vremenem [Dialogue with Time], 2015, no. 50, pp. 116–138. (in Russ.). Timofeyev D. V. [The history of concepts as a theoretical and methodological framework of studies on Russian modernization history of the 1st fourth of the 19th century]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Gumanitarnyye nauki [Izvestia. Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2. Humanities and Arts], 2014, no. 4 (133), pp. 123–136. (in Russ.). Tymyansky G. S. [Lenin and science]. Priroda [Nature], 1934, no. 1, pp. 7–18. (in Russ.). White H. Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore; London: The John Hopkins University Press, 1990. (in English). White H. Metaistoriya: Istoricheskoye voobrazheniye v Evrope XIX veka [Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-century Europe]. Ekaterinburg: UrGU Publ., 2002. (in Russ.). Zenkin S. N. [Roland Barthes and the semiological project]. Bart R. Sistema Mody. Stat’i po semiotike kul’tury [Barthes R. System of Fashion. Articles on the semiotics of culture]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo im. Sabashnikovykh Publ., 2003, pp. 5–28. (in Russ.). |
||
| Download in PDF | |||
