Issue 1 (78)

THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SOVIET “SHARASHKAS” IN THE EARLY 1930S: REASONS, INSTITUTIONS, PERSONS
Year 2023 Number 1(78)
Pages 74-83 Type scientific article
UDC 94(47)“1930/1934” BBK 63.3(2)614
Authors Krasilnikov Sergey A.
Topic EDUCATION AND SCIENCE IN SOVIET AND POST-SOVIET HISTORY
Summary The problematic field of such a specific segment of forced labor as specialist design, technical departments and project bureaus which were created and operated under the OGPU auspices in the first half of the 1930s requires reinterpretation of its canonical research approaches. The paper considers the specific factors of the emergence of “sharashkas” network as an institutional manifestation and the result of stepped-up conservative subordination and forced exploitation by the Stalinist regime of the intellectual potential of the brainpower. The evolvement of the Special Bureaus was the embodiment of the basic characteristics of a mobilization-type campaign (the construct of “sabotage”, extraordinary measures of implementation, extensity, resource intensiveness, strife, unintended consequences). Throughout 1930–1934 imprisoned specialists became an object, a special accounting category and a target group for bureaucratic inter-agency negotiating between security and economic departments, and their deliverables were expropriated. The paradox of the full regime dependence of specialists on chekists and the inverse dependence of the latter on the results of the prisoners’ activities is observed. It is concluded that the established hybrid institution of regime labor comprised of all types of coexisting labor activity — service, compulsory, mobilization, forced — had no functional stability, prospects and capacity for selfdevelopment. An exception was the considered case of the creation of Design Bureau ¹ 11 initiated by L. K. Ramzin, rearranged in 1934 into the Bureau of once-through boiler construction, which worked until the end of the Stalin era.
Keywords classified labor, special bureau of OGPU, inter-agency negotiating, unintended consequences, L. K. Ramzin
References

Nuriev R. T. [The First Special Design Bureau in the Penitentiary System of the Soviet Union]. Kazanskiy vestnik molodykh uchenykh [Kazan Bulletin of Young Scientists], 2019, vol. 3, no. 2 (10), pp. 99–107. (in Russ.).

Repressirovannyye geologi [Repressed Geologists]. Moscow; Saint Petersburg: VSEGEI Publ., 1999. (in Russ.).

Shmukler I. B. [On the Formation of Domestic Direct-Flow Boiler Building]. Elektricheskiye stantsii [Electric Stations], 2001, no. 7, pp. 39–42. (in Russ.).

Siddiqi A. Scientists and Specialists in the Gulag: Life and Death in Stalin’s Sharashka. The Soviet Gulag. Evidence, Interpretation and Comparison. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press, 2016, pp. 87–113. (in English).

Soldatova O. N. Izobretateli i izobretatel’skaya deyatel’nost’ v razvitii nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa promyshlennosti sovetskogo gosudarstva (1917–1956 gg.) [Inventors and Inventive Activity in the Development of Scientific and Technological Progress of the Industry of the Soviet State (1917–1956)]. Samara: As Gard Publ., 2013. (in Russ.).

Soldatova O. N. Izobretateli v GULAGe. Istoricheskiy ocherk [Inventors in the Gulag. Historical Essay]. Samara: Nauch.-tekhn. tsentr Publ., 2004. (in Russ.).

 
Download in PDF