Issue 1 (78)
| SIBERIAN BRANCH OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: BASIC TRENDS OF THE POST-SOVIET TRANSFORMATION | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2023 | Number | 1(78) |
| Pages | 93-103 | Type | scientific article |
| UDC | 06.05(571)“1990/2018” | BBK | 72.4(285.3) |
| Authors | Ablazhey Anatoly M. Ablazhey Natalya N. |
Topic | EDUCATION AND SCIENCE IN SOVIET AND POST-SOVIET HISTORY |
| Summary | The main patterns of adaptation of science to constantly changing conditions of activity are shown on the example of the scientific community of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The authors divide the entire history of post-Soviet science into several periods. The first period, the most dramatic one, from the early 1990s to the early 2000s, was due to adaptation to the market under the conditions of the “shock therapy” of science. The second period lasts from the beginning of the 2000s to 2013, its main content was stabilization associated with the formation of new mechanisms and principles for the implementation of scientific activities, including planning, financing and reporting. Finally, the third period, which began in 2013, is associated with a radical reform of the academic sector of science, which involved depriving the Academy of Sciences of the status of the country’s main “scientific headquarters” and transferring the most important powers to manage fundamental research into the hands of state bodies: first, Federal Agency of Scientific Organizations, and since 2018 — the Ministry of science. There were two basic models of functioning of the academic institute of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: “federal” and “unitary”, which did not exclude the presence of intermediate options. There was also a stratification of the previously fairly homogeneous scientific community, due to the degree of adaptation to the changed conditions of life and activity, the factors of which are involvement in the processes of commercialization of science, the ability to find additional funding (grants, economic agreements), and the demand for scientific topics in the market of scientific products. | ||
| Keywords | fundamental science, post-Soviet science, academic institute, adaptation, commercialization, efficiency criteria, stratification | ||
| References |
Ablazhey A. M. [Russian Science’s Personnel Potential: Experience of Sociological Characteristics]. Sotsial’nyye problemy nauki i innovatsiy [Social Problems of Science and Innovation]. Novosibirsk: Institut filosofii i prava SO RAN Publ., 2002, pp. 69–77. (in Russ.). Ablazhey A. M. [The Neoliberal Context of the Post-Soviet Science]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya [Novosibirsk State University Bulletin. Series: Philosophy], 2012, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 155–160. (in Russ.). Ablazhey A. M. [The Phenomenon of Forced Integration in the Russian Academic Sphere]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya [Philosophy of Education], 2015, no. 4 (61), pp. 176–187. DOI: 10.15372/PHE20150418 (in Russ.). Ablazhey A. M. [The Status and Perspectives for Development of Academic Postgraduate Study: Scientific Supervisors’ Point of View (Based on Research Materials of Mid-2000s)]. Professional’noye obrazovaniye v sovremennom mire [Professional Education in the Modern World], 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2967–2975. DOI: 10.15372/PEMW20190309 (in Russ.). Ablazhey A. M. [Young Russian Scientists: A Comparative Analysis of Social Characteristics (On The Materials of the Sociological Monitoring of the Novosibirsk Scientific Center)]. Vosproizvodstvennyye mekhanizmy rossiyskoy nauki: sovremennoye sostoyaniye i perspektivy razvitiya [Reproductive Mechanisms of Russian Science: Current State and Development Prospects]. Novosibirsk: Institut filosofii i prava SO RAN Publ., 2004, pp. 103–125. (in Russ.). Ablazhey A. M. Vosproizvodstvo nauki v sovremennoy Rossii [Reproduction of Science in Modern Russia]. Novosibirsk: Institut filosofii i prava SO RAN Publ., 2006. (in Russ.). Dezhina I. G. [Reform of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Causes and Consequences for Science in Russia]. Russie.Nei.Visions. Moscow: Center Russia/NNG; Paris: IFRI, 2014, no. 77. Available at: http://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ifri_rnv_77_ran_reforma_rus_dezhina_may_2014.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2023) (in Russ.). Doroshenko V., Korshever I., Matizen V. [Novosibirsk Research Center: Is There a Strategic Alternative?]. Otechestvennye zapiski [Domestic Notes], 2002, no. 7 (8), pp. 259–272. Available at: https://strana-oz.ru/2002/7/novosibirskiy-nauchnyy-centr-est-li-strategicheskaya-alternativa (accessed: 20.01.2023) (in Russ.). Gordienko A. A., Eremin S. N., Plyusnin Yu. M., Putilov A. A., Ablazhey A. M. [Novosibirsk “Academic Town” in 1996]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Research], 1997, no. 12, pp. 68–77. (in Russ.). Koptyug V. A. [On Possible Ways of Reorganizing the Structure of the Academic Scientific Community]. Rossiyskaya nauka: sostoyaniye i problemy razvitiya. Vserossiyskiy seminar 19–21 sentyabrya 1996 g. [Russian Science: Status and Problems of Development. All-Russian Seminar, September 19–21, 1996]. Novosibirsk: SO RAN Publ., 1996, pp. 13–22. (in Russ.). Mirowski Ph., Van Horn R. The Contract Research Organization and the Commercialization of Science. Social Studies of Science, 2005, vol. 35, iss. 4, pp. 503–548. DOI: 10.1177/0306312705052103 (in English). Mirowski Ph., Sent E.-M. The Commercialization of Science and the Response of STS. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. London; Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2008, pp. 635–689. (in English). Plyusnin Yu. M. [“Superfluous People” in Science: An Experience of Socio-Psychological Investigation]. Naukovedenie [Science Studies], 1999, no. 1, pp. 7–19. (in Russ.). Plyusnin Yu. M. [Why “Superfluous People” Don’t Leave Science?]. Naukovedenie [Science Studies], 2002, no. 1, pp. 109–118. (in Russ.). Plyusnin Yu. M., Gordienko A. A. Nauchnoye soobshchestvo Akademgorodka v period transformatsii obshchestvennoy zhizni Rossii: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskiy aspekt: monitoring sotsial’no-psikhologicheskogo sostoyaniya nauchnykh kollektivov NNTs v 1992–1995 gg. [The Scientific Community of Akademgorodok in the Period of Transformation of Public Life in Russia: Socio-Psychological Aspect: Monitoring of the Socio-Psychological State of Scientific Teams of the NSC in 1992–1995]. Novosibirsk: S. n., 1995. (in Russ.). Plyusnin Yu. M., Kupershtokh N. A., Ablazhey A. M. [Scientific Communities of Siberian Cities (Based on Field Research)]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo Gumanitarnogo Nauchnogo Fonda [Bulletin of the Russian Humanitarian Scientific Fund], 2004, no. 4 (37), pp. 130–141. (in Russ.). Polozhikhina M. A. [Different Results of Reforming Russian Science]. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye problemy Rossii [Economic and Social Problems of Russia], 2019, no. 2 (40), pp. 100–138. DOI: 10.31249/espr/2019.02.05 (in Russ.). Rossiyskaya akademiya nauk. Sibirskoye otdeleniye. Istoricheskiy ocherk [The Russian Academy of Sciences. Siberian branch. Historical Essay]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 2007. (in Russ.). Yurevich A.V. Umnyye, no bednyye: uchenyye v sovremennoy Rossii [Clever but Poor: Scientists in Modern Russia]. Moscow: Moskovskiy obshchestvennyy nauchnyy fond, Izdatel’skiy tsentr nauchnykh i uchebnykh program Publ., 1998. (in Russ.). |
||
| Download in PDF | |||
