SUBJECTIVITY OF THE KAZAKH NOMADIC CULTURE IN THE 1960S POETRY OF OLZHAS SULEIMENOV | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | 2023 | Number | 1(78) |
Pages | 123-132 | Type | scientific article |
UDC | 82-1(574)“1960/1970” | BBK | 83.3(2Êàç) |
Authors | Krupko Igor V. |
Topic | ETHNOHISTORY SOURCES AND RESEARCH METHODS |
Summary | The article is devoted to the reflection in the historiosophical works of the Kazakh poet of the sixties Olzhas Suleimenov the key plots for the formation of historical memory in the Kazakh society in the 20th century: the loss of the nomadic way of life, the museumified play of symbols of nomadic existence from the point of its no return (urban chronotope of sedentarized nomadic culture), perception the historical memory of the Kazakh society of cultural heritage of the urban culture of Central Asia, dialogized with world culture within the framework of the autochthonism concept. The studied literary and historiosophical material makes it possible to comprehend the problem of the correlation of the nomadic and the settled in the historical memory of Kazakhstan society and the presence of the cultural trauma of “being ahistorical”, overcame in the second half of the 20th century. The factors that shaped this cultural trauma include: 1) interruption of nomadic culture as a result of forced collectivization and the transfer of nomads to settled life in the 1920s–1930s; 2) historiographic tradition of describing nomadic culture as regressive and its perception by the Kazakh national intelligentsia in the 1960s–1970s through the dominant historical narrative. The way to overcome this trauma was dialogic assimilation of the cultural heritage of the medieval urban culture of Central Asia, the active archaeological research of which begins in these years in the Kazakh SSR, and inscription of the reformatted historical subjectivity in the history of civilization. | ||
Keywords | nomadic culture, historical memory, cultural trauma, multiple identity, historical subjectivity, Soviet Kazakh literature, Olzhas Suleimenov | ||
References |
Abylkhozhin Zh. B. Traditsionnaya struktura Kazakhstana. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye aspekty funktsionirovaniya i transformatsii (1920–1930 gg.) [Traditional Structure of Kazakhstan. Socio-Economic Aspects of Functioning and Transformation (1920–1930)]. Alma-Ata: Ġylym Publ., 1991. (in Russ.). Afanasyeva A. [“To Liberate. From Shaitans and Charlatans:” Discourses and Practices of Russian Medicine in the Kazakh Steppe in the Nineteenth Century]. Ab Imperio, 2008, no. 4, pp. 113–150. (in Russ.). Alexander J. [Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity]. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal [Sociological Journal], 2012, no. 3, pp. 5–40. (in Russ.). Asfendiarov S. A. Şığarmaları. Törttomdıq şığarmalar jïnağı [Works. Collection of Works in Four Volumes]. Almaty: “El-shezhire” Publ., 2014. (in Kazakh). Baypakov K. M. [From the History of the Study of the Archaeological and Cultural Heritage of Otrar, the Otrar Oasis and Kazakhstan]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauch.-praktich. konf., posvyashchennoy 40-letiyu rabot Yuzhno-Kazakhstanskoy kompleksnoy arkheologicheskoy ekspeditsii [Materials of the International Sci. and Practical Conf. Dedicated to the 40th Anniversary of the Work of the South Kazakhstan Complex Archaeological Expedition]. Almaty, 2014, pp. 11–49. (in Russ.). Baypakov K. M. [The Concept of the Formation of Historical Consciousness in the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Tasks of Domestic Archaeology (To the Preparation of a 10-Volume History of the Kazakhs and Kazakhstan)]. Izvestiya Natsional’noy akademii nauk Respubliki Kazakhstan. Seriya obshchestvennykh i gumanitarnykh nauk [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Series of Social and Human Sciences], 2014, no. 5 (297), pp. 226–232. (in Russ.). Bustanov A. [Between the Nation and the Artifact: Eastern Archaeology in Soviet Kazakhstan]. Musul’mane v novoy imperskoy istorii [Muslims in the New Imperial History]. Moscow: OOO “Sadra” Publ., 2017, pp. 38–79. (Islamica & Orientalistica). (in Russ.). Fal’sifikatsiya istoricheskikh istochnikov i konstruirovaniye etnokraticheskikh mifov [Falsification of Historical Sources and Construction of Ethnocratic Myths]. Moscow: IA RAN Publ., 2011. (in Russ.). Kochevaya al’ternativa sotsial’noy evolyutsii [Nomadic Alternative to Social Evolution]. Moscow: Institut Afriki RAN Publ., 2002. (in Russ.). Krupko I. V., Nurzhanov A. A., Sydykov A. Zh., Kaldybaeva G. A. Archaeological Researches in the Territory of Kazakhstan in Russia during the Empire (1733–1917). Bylye Gody. Rossiyskiy istoricheskiy zhurnal [Bylye Gody — Russian Historical Journal], 2020, vol. 56, iss. 2, pp. 474–485. DOI: 10.13187/bg.2020.2.474 (in English). Levshin A. I. Opisaniye kirgiz-kaysatskikh ili kirgiz-kazach’ikh ord i stepey [Description of the Kirghiz-Kaisak or Kirghiz-Cossack Hordes and Steppes]. Pavlodar: NPF “EKO” Publ., 2005. (in Russ.). Marchenko A. M. [Song of Songs or Historical Detective Story?]. Literaturno-khudozhestvennyy al’manakh “Artbukhta” [Literary and Artistic Almanac “Artbukhta”], 2014, no. 3, International special issue: Russia–Kazakhstan, pp. 390–405. (in Russ.). Masanov N. E. Kochevaya tsivilizatsiya kazakhov: osnovy zhiznedeyatel’nosti nomadnogo obshchestva [Nomadic Civilization of the Kazakhs: Foundations of the life of a Nomadic Society]. Almaty: “Sotsinvest” Publ.; Moscow: “Gorizont” Publ., 1995. (in Russ.). Preobrazhenskij S. J. [On “Imaginary Philology” by O. O. Suleiminov]. Polilingvial’nost’ i transkul’turnyye praktiki [Polylinguality and Transcultural Practices], 2018, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 406–409. DOI: 10.22363/2618-897X-2018-15-3-406-409 (in Russ.). Shnirelman V. [Symbolic past. Struggle for Ancestors in Central Asia]. Neprikosnovennyy zapas. Debaty o politike i kul’ture [Emergency Reserve. Debate on Politics and Culture], 2009, no. 4 (66), pp. 70–86. (in Russ.). Snegirev V. N. Olzhas Suleymenov [Olzhas Suleimenov]. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya Publ., 2020. (in Russ.). |
||
Download in PDF |