Issue 2 (79)
| SETTING THE STAGE: ENEOLITHIC AND BRONZE AGE LITHIC INDUSTRY MARKERS IN THE MOUNTAIN-FOREST TRANS-URALS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2023 | Number | 2(79) |
| Pages | 116-126 | Type | scientific article |
| UDC | 903(470.5)“636/637” | BBK | 63.442.6(235.55) |
| Authors | Korochkova Olga N. Spiridonov Ivan A. Usacheva Irina V. |
Topic | ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH |
| Summary | The authors propose to discuss the methodology of searching for the defi nitive indicators of flaking techniques of the Eneolithic — Bronze Age in the mountain-forest Trans-Urals. The methodology is based on a step-by-step cross-referencing analysis of raw materials, technological and morphological characteristics of stone artifacts. The multilayer settlement Shaitanskoe 4–6 stone tools assemblage (the Kirovgrad district, Sverdlovsk Oblast) served as the main resource for the analysis. Main stages of the site’s populating correlated with the Eneolithic and the Bronze Age (Cherkaskul culture). Arrowheads were chosen as the key category of artifacts. This choice was based on both the large number of these artifacts (more than 100 items) and their fairly reliable cultural and chronological verification by the well-known interments and single-layer sites of the Urals and the adjacent territories. The Eneolithic flaking technique demonstrated a pronounced variability of tools. Pressure flaking technique used for obtaining blanks of a certain type (blades, microblades, and flakes of preset shapes and sizes) formed the lithic industry basis. During the Bronze Age, the emphasis shifted towards biface-production-oriented striking and counter striking knapping techniques. One of the Bronze Age lithic industry markers was a significant amount of characteristic waste, defected and good blanks as opposed to a small group of two-sided retouched tools with a high level of standardization and manufacturing quality (arrowheads, knives of an asymmetrical triangular shape with an arc-shaped side blade, scrapers of geometric shapes, etc.). The Eneolithic population preferred siliceous and clay shales, high-quality homogeneous jaspers, some types of chalcedony of gray and yellow, homogeneous flint of greenish and greenish-gray shades, and rhyolites of similar colors. During the Bronze Age, most popular materials were mottled flint of mediocre quality, siliceous shales of dark shades, siliceous quartz and chalcedony of light tones, and some varieties of jasper. | ||
| Keywords | Urals, archaeology, stone industry, arrowheads, typology, morphology, technology, raw material | ||
| References |
Bader O. N. Basseyn Oki v epokhu bronzy [The Oka basin in the Bronze Age]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1970. (in Russ.). Chairkina N. M. Pogrebal’nyye kompleksy epokhi eneolita i rannego zheleznogo veka Srednego Zaural’ya (po materialam kul’tovo-pogrebal’noy ploshchadki Skvortsovskaya Gora V) [Burial complexes of the Eneolithic and Early Iron Age of the Middle Trans-Urals (Based on the Materials of the Cult-Burial Site Skvortsovskaya Gora V)]. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN Publ., 2011. (in Russ.). Chernykh E. N., Kuzminykh S. V. Drevnyaya metallurgiya Severnoy Evrazii (seyminsko-turbinskiy fenomen) [Ancient Metallurgy of Northern Eurasia (the Seima-Turbino Phenomenon)]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1989. (in Russ.). Dryabina L. A., Skochina S. N. [Tool Set of the Velizhany II Sanctuary]. AB OVO: problemy genezisa kul’tury [AB OVO: Problems of the Genesis of Culture]. Tyumen: TyumGU Publ., 2005, pp. 26–35. (in Russ.). Epimakhov A. V. Ranniye kompleksnyye obshchestva severa Tsentral’noy Evrazii (po materialam mogil’nika Kamennyy Ambar-5) [Early Complex Societies of the North of Central Eurasia (Based on Materials from the Kamenny Ambar-5 Burial Ground)]. Chelyabinsk: OAO “Chelyabinskiy dom pechati” Publ., 2005, book 1. (in Russ.). Epimakhov A. V., Semyan I. A. [Arrowheads in the Kamenny Ambar Settlement and Some Remarks on Military Conflicts in the Sintashta Society]. Ural’skij istoriceskij vestnik [Ural Historical Journal], 2016, no. 4 (53), pp. 77–84. (in Russ.). Girya E. Yu., Prut A. A. [Secondary Lateral Accompanying Chips as a Criterion for Determining the Squeezing Technique of Chipping]. Metody izucheniya kamennykh artefaktov. Materialy mezhdunar. konf. (g. Sankt-Peterburg, 16–18 noyabrya 2015 g.) [Methods for the Study of Stone Artifacts. Proceedings of the International Conf. (St. Petersburg, November 16–18, 2015)]. Saint Petersburg: IIMK RAN Publ., 2015, pp. 51–57. (in Russ.). Khalyaev P. K. [Stone Tools of the Balakino I Settlement]. Voprosy arkheologii Urala [Questions of Archaeology of the Urals]. Sverdlovsk: UrGU Publ., 1981, iss. 15, pp. 97–99. (in Russ.). Korochkova O. N., Spiridonov I. A. [New Finds of Flint Plastic Art in the Mountainous-Forest Trans-Urals]. Kratkiye soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology], 2021, no. 264, pp. 193–200. DOI: 10.25681/IARAS.0130-2620.264.193-200 (in Russ.). Korochkova O. N., Spiridonov I. A., Usacheva I. V., Shagalov E. S. Diversity of Lithic Raw Material Types Used by the Population of the Mountain-Forest Trans-Urals (3rd–2nd Millennium BC). Geoarchaeology and Archaeological Mineralogy: Proceedings of 7th Geoarchaeological Conference, Miass, Russia, 19–23 October 2020. Cham: Springer, 2022, pp. 257–265. (Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-86040-0_22 (in English). Korochkova O. N., Stefanov V. I., Spiridonov I. A. Svyatilishche pervykh metallurgov Srednego Urala [The Sanctuary of the First Metallurgists of the Middle Urals]. Ekaterinburg: UrFU Publ., 2020. (in Russ.). Kosinskaya L. L. [Stone Tools]. Satyga XVI: seyminsko-turbinskiy mogil’nik v tayezhnoy zone Zapadnoy Sibiri [Satyga XVI: Seima-Turbinsky Burial Ground in the Taiga Zone of Western Siberia]. Ekaterinburg; Surgut: Ural’skiy rabochiy Publ., 2011, pp. 44–51. (Materials and Research on the Archaeology of the Taiga Priobye). (in Russ.). Kostomarova Yu. V. [Reconstruction of Main Elements Economy of the Ñherkaskul Population of the Late Bronze Age in the Forest-Steppe Tobol Region]. Povolzhskaya arkheologiya [The Volga River Region Archaeology], 2019, no. 3 (29), pp. 51–64. DOI: 10.24852/pa2019.3.29.51.64 (in Russ.). Kuzmina O. V. Abashevskaya kul’tura v lesostepnom Volgo-Ural’ye: Ucheb. posob. k spetskursu [The Abashevskaya Culture in the Forest-Steppe Volga-Urals: A Textbook for a Special Course]. Samara: SamGPU Publ., 1992. (in Russ.). Matveev A. V. Pervyye andronovtsy v lesakh Zaural’ya [The First Andronovites in the Forests of the Trans-Urals]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 1998. (in Russ.). Matveev A. V., Matveeva N. P., Serikov Yu. B., Skochina S. N. Kul’tovyye pamyatniki epokhi eneolita [Cult Sites of the Eneolithic Era]. Tyumen: TyumGU Publ., 2015. (Antiquities of the Ingalskaya Valley; iss. 3). (in Russ.). Matveeva N. P., Suchilina N. Yu. [Characteristics of the Eneolithic Funeral Rite in the Tobol River Region (the Burial Ground in the Settlement of Ustyug-3)]. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii [Bulletin of Archaeology, Anthropology and Ethnography], 2020, no. 4 (51), pp. 5–16. DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2020-51-4-1 (in Russ.). Nikolsky V. Yu. [Raw Material Composition of Stone Tools]. Chairkina N. M. Pogrebal’nyye kompleksy epokhi eneolita i rannego zheleznogo veka Srednego Zaural’ya (po materialam kul’tovo-pogrebal’noy ploshchadki Skvortsovskaya Gora V) [Chairkina N. M. Burial Complexes of the Eneolithic and Early Iron Age of the Middle Trans-Urals (Based on the Materials of the Cult-Burial Site Skvortsovskaya Gora V)]. Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN Publ., 2011, appendix 1, pp. 168–171. (in Russ.). Potemkina T. M. Bronzovyy vek lesostepnogo Pritobol’ya [The Bronze Age of the Forest-Steppe Tobol Region]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1985. (in Russ.). Serikov Yu. B. [Balakino I — Site of the Bronze Age in the Vicinity of Nizhny Tagil (Middle Trans-Urals)]. Arkheologiia Evraziiskikh Stepei [Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes], 2022, no. 2, pp. 302–312. DOI: 10.24852/2587-6112.2022.2.302.312 (in Russ.). Serikov Yu. B. Shaytanskoye ozero — svyashchennoye ozero drevnosti [Shaitanskoye Lake — the Sacred Lake of Antiquity]. Nizhny Tagil: NTGSPA Publ., 2013. (in Russ.). Stefanov V. I. [The Cemetery Tovkurtlor 3: Seima-Turbino Traces in the Lower Ob’ Basin]. Rossiiskaia arkheologiia [Russian Archaeology], 2006, no. 1, pp. 44–58. (in Russ.). Zakh V. A., Skochina S. N., Parkhimovich S. G. [The Burial Ground of Chepkul 21 in the North of the Andreevsky Lake System]. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii [Bulletin of Archaeology, Anthropology and Ethnography], 2006, iss. 6, pp. 24–41. (in Russ.). Zakh V. A., Zotova S. V., Panfilov A. N. [Ancient Burial Grounds on Andreevsky Lake near Tyumen]. Drevniye pogrebeniya Ob’-Irtysh’ya [Ancient Burials of the Ob-Irtysh Region]. Omsk: OmGU Publ., 1991, pp. 13–42. (in Russ.). |
||
| Download in PDF | |||
