Issue 2 (79)

ON THE CULTURAL ATTRIBUTION OF ONE TYPE OF THE SROSTKI BELT SET
Year 2023 Number 2(79)
Pages 146-150 Type scientific article
UDC 904(470.5) BBK 63.444(235.55)
Authors Botalov Sergey G.
Grudochko Ivan V.
Topic ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Summary In the autumn of 2021, a new medieval site of Aktyuba was discovered in the Southern Urals. As a result of the research, a sacrificial complex was discovered, consisting of a richly decorated horse harness with polymetallic (silver, gold) shields in the Hungarian (Carpathian) style, as well as a belt consisting of a buckle and shields of the Altai (Srostki) style. The subsequent cartography of such materials indicates that they are distributed in sites of the Hungarian type, located in a strip from Altai to the Carpathian basin. Radiocarbon dating of the complex of the Srostki and Carpathian styles at the burial grounds of Uyelgi and Aktyuba made it possible to determine that they coexist in the Southern Trans-Urals within the 9th century, i. e ., before the exodus of the Hungarians to a new homeland. In this regard, the authors conclude that the “Carpathian” style seems to be a new special pictorial concept, which is based on the ideas and pictorial plots of the Sayano-Altai. It is a kind of rethought and artistic reworking of the same plant ornamentation, which is based on flowers, leaves, buds and fruits of the Tree of Life, as well as plots of anthropomorphic and zoomorphic Buddhist-Nestorian semantics. From this follows the assumption that the origin of Hungarian pictorial motifs did not take place in the Carpathian basin, but in the contact zone, which was the Southern Trans-Urals, under the direct influence of immigrants from the Sayano-Altai regions. At the same time, the production and raw materials resources of the Southern Urals are by no means inferior to the Altai deposits. In this regard, it is not accidental that the direct mixing of these styles takes place in the burial complexes of Uyelgi and Aktyuba.
Keywords Southern Trans-Urals, Uyelgi, Aktyuba, Srostki culture, Manichaeism, syncretism
References

A honfoglaló magyarság: kiállítási katalógus [The Conquering Hungarians: Exhibition Catalogue]. Budapest: Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum Publ., 1996. (in Hungarian).

Botalov S. G., Tairov A. D., Grudochko I. V., Gazizova S. R., Parunin A. V. [Aktjuba — a New Magyar Complex in the Southern Trans-Urals]. Trudy Kamskoy arkheologo-etnograficheskoy ekspeditsii [Proceedings of the Kama Archaeological and Ethnographic Expedition]. Perm: Permskiy gosudarstvennyy gumanitarnopedagogicheskiy universitet Publ., 2021, no. 19, pp. 84–90. (in Russ.).

Gáll E., Szenthe G. The Problem of “Structural Integration”. A Case Study of the 9th–10th Century Burials (graves 49 and 50) at Hortobágy — Arkus. Materiale şi cercetări arheologice (serie nouă), 2020, no. 16, pp. 181–197. DOI: 10.3406/mcarh.2020.2134 (in English).

Korol’ G. G. Iskusstvo srednevekovykh kochevnikov Evrazii. Ocherki [Art of Medieval Nomads of Eurasia. Essays]. Moscow; Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat Publ., 2008. (in Russ.)

Korol’ G. G., Naumova O. B. Khudozhestvennyy metall u kochevnikov (Tsentral’naya Aziya rubezha I–II tys.) [Artistic Metal Among Nomads of Central Asia in the 1st–2nd Millennium AD]. Moscow: IA RAN Publ., 2017. (in Russ.).

Kyzlasov L. R. [Northern Manichaeism and its Role in the Cultural Development of the Peoples of Siberia and Central Asia]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 8: Istoriya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 8: History], 1998, no. 3, pp. 3–35. (in Russ.).

László K. Eastern Religious Motifs on the Belt Mounts of Subotsi Group, Kushnarenkovo Culture and Lomovatovo Culture. Arkheologiia Evraziiskikh Stepei [Archaeology of the Eurasian Steppes], 2018, no. 6, pp. 136–149. (in English).

Mesterházy K. [Band Bracelets from the Hungarian Conquest Period]. Két világ határán: Természetés társadalomtudományi tanulmányok a 70 éves Költő László tiszteletére [On the border of two worlds: Natural and social studies in honor of the 70-year-old László Költő]. Kaposhvar: Rippl-Rónai Megyei Hatókörű Városi Múzeum, 2018, pp. 187–230. DOI: 10.26080/krrmkozl.2018.6.187 (in Hungarian).

 
Download in PDF