RUSSIANS IN TURKESTAN: ADAPTING TO THE LOCAL CULTURE OR SERVING IN THE NAME OF EMPIRE BUILDING? | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | 2024 | Number | 2(83) |
Pages | 113-120 | Type | scientific article |
UDC | 94(47+575.1) | BBK | 63.3(2+5Óçá) |
Authors | Alimdzhanov Bakhtiyor A. |
Topic | RUSSIANS IN DIFFERENT ETHNIC ENVIRONMENT: PROBLEMS OF ADAPTATION |
Summary | The article considers the cultural adaptation of two generations of the Russian population in Turkestan. The biographies of the “first Turkestanians” — the diplomat (N. Petrovsky), military man and scientist (V. P. Nalivkin), missionary (N. P. Ostroumov), military man and administrator (N. S. Lykoshin) — are presented as examples of cultural adaptation to local realities. The biographies of these people catch a pattern: they were born in European Russia, came to Turkestan when they were young to make a career, taught and knew local languages and culture well. The main motivation for their actions can be describe as desire to serve faithfully and honestly to the interests of the Russian Empire in the East. Conditionally, we call them the first generation of Turkestan Russians who worked for the benefit and strengthening of the empire. The author also drew upon personal cards of bank employees of the “second generation of Turkestanians” who were actively involved in the socio-economic life of Russian Turkestan. The author believes that the views of the first generation of Russians on local culture were orientalist and Messianic. The first generation of “Turkestanians” dreamed of merging cultures and integrating the local economy into the general imperial one. The second generation of Russians, who were born in Turkestan, radically differed from the first generation, and was less orientalist, and they had almost no elements of exclusivity and Messianism. Russians born in Turkestan learned languages faster, adapted to the local culture, received education in Tashkent and Kokand, worked in local government and financial structures. When writing the article, the author used unpublished archival materials of the Russian Federation and Uzbekistan, memoirs, as well as personal correspondence of diplomats and military personnel. | ||
Keywords | Russian Turkestan, adaptation, Russians, empire, Central Asia, culture, Turkestanians | ||
References |
Abashin S. N. [V. P. Nalivkin: “...There Will Be What Inevitably Must Be; and What Must Inevitably Be Can No Longer Be...” The Crisis of Orientalism in the Russian Empire?]. Aziatskaya Rossiya: lyudi i struktury imperii [Asian Russia: People and Structures of the Empire]. Omsk: Izd-vo Omskogo gos. un-ta Publ., 2005, pp. 43–97. (in Russ.). Abdurasulov U. [Ostroumov and the Ideology of Colonization]. Vostok Svyshe [East Above], 2013, iss. 32, no. 4, pp. 66–68. (in Russ.). Alimdjanov B. A. [Orientalisms May Differ]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History], 2019, vol. 64, iss. 4, pp. 1488–1497. DOI: 10.21638/11701/ spbu02.2019.420 (in Russ.). Alimdzhanov B. A., Choriev Sh. Kh. [Employees of the Volga-Kama Commercial Bank Branches in Central Asia: Biographies and Activities at the Turn of the 20th Century in the Context of Imperial Periphery]. Vestnik arkhivista [Herald of an Archivist], 2021, no. 2, pp. 450–468. DOI: 10.28995/2073-0101-2021-2-450-468 (in Russ.). Babadzhanov B. M. [Nikolai Ostroumov: A “Missionary”, “Islamic Scholar”, “Civilizer”?]. Vostok Svyshe [East Above], 2013, iss. 32, no. 4, pp. 29–51. (in Russ.). Babadzhanov B. M. [Afterword to the Discussion]. Vostok Svyshe [East Above], 2013, iss. 32, no. 4, pp. 75–80. (in Russ.). Baskhanov M. K. Istoriya izucheniya vostochnykh yazykov v russkoy imperatorskoy armii [History of Studying Oriental Languages in the Russian Imperial Army]. Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2018. (in Russ.). Brezhneva S. N. [Reflection of Acculturation Idea in the Resettlement Policy of the Russian Empire in Turkestan at the Turn of the 20th Century]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Istoriya Rossii [RUDN Journal of Russian History], 2018, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 608–638. (in Russ.). Brusina O. I. Slavyane v Sredney Azii. Etnicheskiye i sotsial’nyye protsessy. Konets XIX — konets XX veka [Slavs in Central Asia. Ethnic and Social Processes. The End of the 19th — the End of the 20th Century]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura Publ., 2001. (in Russ.). Dzhumaev A. [More about Ostroumov’s “Missionary Work”]. Vostok Svyshe [East Above], 2013, iss. 32, no. 4, pp. 55–66. (in Russ.). Flygin Yu. S. [Nikolai Ostroumov: “I Consider Myself Not a Useless Person for People of Other Faiths... and By No Means Their Enemy”]. Vostok Cvyshe [East Above], 2013, iss. 32, no. 4, pp. 68–75. (in Russ.). Khalid A. [Russian History and the Debate over Orientalism]. Rossiyskaya imperiya v zarubezhnoy istoriografii. Raboty poslednikh let [Russian Empire in Foreign Historiography. Works of Recent Years]. Moscow: Novoye izdatel’stvo Publ., 2005, pp. 310–323. (in Russ.). Khan V. S. [Déjà vu and Meeting with the “Stranger”]. II Vostokovedcheskiye chteniya pamyati N. P. Ostroumova [2nd Orientalist Readings in Memory of N. P. Ostroumov]. Tashkent: Tashkentskaya i Sredneaziatskaya mitropoliya Moskovskogo Patriarkhata Russkoy pravoslavnoy Tserkvi Publ., 2010, pp. 108–113. (in Russ.). Knight N. [On Russian Orientalism: A Response to Adeeb Khalid]. Rossiyskaya imperiya v zarubezhnoy istoriografii. Raboty poslednikh let [Russian Empire in Foreign Historiography. Works of Recent Years]. Moscow: Novoye izdatel’stvo Publ., 2005, pp. 324–344. (in Russ.). Kotyukova T. V. [Antipode of the Man in the Case. Memories of V. P. Nalivkin]. Vostochnyy arkhiv [Eastern Archive], 2010, no. 1 (21), pp. 76–89. (in Russ.). Litvinenko P. V. [Strange Neophites of Islam: The Transition of Christians to Islam in Russian Turkestan]. Istoriya: fakty i simvoly [History: Facts and Symbols], 2022, no. 3 (32), pp. 36–51. DOI: 10.24888/2410- 4205-2022-32-3-36-51 (in Russ.). Litvinov P. P. [From Christ to Mohammed: Religious Renegadeism in Central Asia (Late 19th — Early 20th Centuries) (Based on Archival Materials)]. Sobor (al’manakh po religiovedeniyu) [Cathedral (Almanac on Religious Studies)]. Elets: EGPI Publ., 1999, vol. 1, pp. 131–151. (in Russ.). Morrison A. [Sufism, Pan-Islamism and Information Panic: Nil Sergeevich Lykoshin and the Aftermath of the Andijan Uprising]. Tartaria Magna, 2013, no. 2, pp. 42–87. (in Russ.). Pugovkina O. G. [Nil Sergeevich Lykoshin: From Samarkand Military Governor to Soviet Professor]. Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost’ [Oriens], 2018, no. 6, pp. 124–141. DOI: 10.31857/ S086919080002872-6 (in Russ.). Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoye i politicheskoye polozheniye Uzbekistana nakanune Oktyabrya [The Socio-Economic and Political Situation of Uzbekistan on the Eve of October]. Tashkent: Fan Publ., 1973. (in Russ.). Todorova M. [Does Russian Orientalism Have a Russian Soul? A Contribution to the Debate between Nathaniel Knight and Adeeb Khalid]. Rossiyskaya imperiya v zarubezhnoy istoriografii. Raboty poslednikh let [Russian Empire in Foreign Historiography. Works of Recent Years]. Moscow: Novoye izdatel’stvo Publ., 2005, pp. 345–360. (in Russ.). Tsyryapkina Y. [“Fighting for the Russian Cause”: The Imperial Colonisation of Turkestan]. Quaestio Rossica, 2022, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1625–1641. DOI: 10.15826/qr.2022.5.751 (in Russ.). Vasiliev D. V. Bremya imperii. Administrativnaya politika Rossii v Tsentral’noy Azii. Vtoraya polovina XIX v. [Burden of the Empire. Administrative Policy of Russia in Central Asia. Second Half of the 19th Century]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 2018. (in Russ.). Vosstaniya 1916 g. v Aziatskoy Rossii: neizvestnoye ob izvestnom (k 100-letiyu Vysochayshego poveleniya 25 iyunya 1916 g.) [The 1916 Uprisings in Asian Russia: The Unknown about the Known (To the 100th Anniversary of the Highest Command on June 25, 1916)]. Moscow: Russkiy impul’s Publ., 2017. (in Russ.). |
||
Download in PDF |