“KARYMS” — THE PHENOMENON OF INTERETHNIC MIXING OF RUSSIANS AND BURYATS IN THE SOUTHEAST OF EASTERN SIBERIA | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | 2024 | Number | 2(83) |
Pages | 121-128 | Type | scientific article |
UDC | 39:94(571.5)“16/20” | BBK | 63.5(253.5) |
Authors | Zhambalova Sesegma G. |
Topic | RUSSIANS IN DIFFERENT ETHNIC ENVIRONMENT: PROBLEMS OF ADAPTATION |
Summary | Based on fieldwork, archival, literary, and electronic sources, the article explores the phenomenon of interethnic mixing of Russians and Buryats in the southeast of Eastern Siberia — the settled indigenous people, the Karyms. Ideographic and comparative methods have allowed considering this topic from the imperial era to the 21st century. Since the late 17th century, the region became an arena for interaction between two peoples, races, language families, cultures, and religions. The nomadic experience of the Buryats provided cultural receptions for the adaptation of Russians. It is revealed that imperial policies regarding the Karyms, on one hand, supported internal isolation of traditional Buryat and Russian societies, while, on the other hand, implementing a gradual ac-culturation of some baptized Buryats who transitioned, thanks to interethnic marriage, to a settled way of life. Three stages in the formation of the Karyms identity are identified. The first, imperial stage, involved the formation of an interethnic group of indigenous people with special rights and duties, leading a settled lifestyle as peasant-farmers under Steppe councils. Isolation and the border position shaped an ethnic group with a common origin, culture, language, and self-awareness. The second stage was a period of voluntary assimilation: during Soviet times, the Karyms reasonably identified themselves as Russians. The third stage, in the 21st century, sees the Karyms descendants striving to officially assert themselves. The correlation between the concepts of “Karym” and “metis” is examined, proving their ambiguity. The term “metis” denotes a borderline anthropological type, referring to an individual’s phenotype. The Karyms represent a phenomenon of interethnic mixing between Russians and the Buryats in the southeast of Eastern Siberia, the result of one facet of Russia’s colonial policy that contributed to stabilizing the ethno-political and demographic situation. | ||
Keywords | Southeast of Eastern Siberia, Russians, Buryats, Karyms, subethnicity, cultural receptions, phenomenon, interethnic mixing, acculturation, assimilation | ||
References |
Bazarov B. V., Plekhanova A. M., Nolev E. V. [Republic of Buryatia in the Panorama of the 100th Anniversary: Historical Milestones and Achievements]. Mongolovedeniye (Mongol sudlal) [Mongolian Studies (Mongol Sudlal)], 2023, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 115–128. DOI: 10.22162/2500-1523-2023-1-115-128 (in Russ.). Buraeva O. V. [Peculiarities of the Russian Ethnos’ Adaptation in the Baikal Region]. Vestnik Buryatskogo nauchnogo tsentra Sibirskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Bulletin of the Buryat Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences], 2011, no. 1, pp. 41–49. (in Russ.). Buraeva O. V. Khozyaystvennyye i etnokul’turnyye svyazi russkikh, buryat i evenkov v XVII–XIX vv. [Economic and Ethnocultural Communications of Russians, Buryats and Evenks in the 17th–19th Centuries]. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo BNTs SO RAN Publ., 2000. (in Russ.). Galindabaeva V. V., Karbainov N. I. [Karyms and Mestizos of Buryatia: Marginal Man and/or Cultural Broker]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology], 2020, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 204–232. DOI: 10.31119/jssa.2020.23.4.8 (in Russ.). Galindabaeva V. V., Karbainov N. I. [The Karyms and Semeiskie in Buryatia: Transformation of the Ethnic Frontier]. Ab Imperio, 2020, no. 3, pp. 115–156. DOI: 10.1353/imp.2020.0059 (in Russ.). Karbainov N. I. [Karymy and Yasachnyie in the Irkutsk Guberniya and Transbaikal Oblast’ at the End of the 19th Century: The Number of Ethno-Confessional Groups and Their Estate Structure]. Istoricheskaya demografiya [Historical Demography], 2019, no. 1 (23), pp. 27–31. DOI: 10.19110/ 2304-5922-2019-1-27-31 (in Russ.). Kupriyanova I. V. [Relationships between Russian Old Believers and Indigenous Peoples of Altai as a Resource for Colonization]. Uchenyye zapiski (Altayskaya gosudarstvennaya akademiya kul’tury i iskusstv) [Proceedings of Altai State Academy of Culture and Arts], 2019, no. 2 (20), pp. 77–81. DOI: 10.32340/2414-9101-2019-2-77-81 (in Russ.). Tatarnikova A. I. [Everyday Life of Peasants in Extreme Conditions of Migration to Siberia (Late XIX — Early XX Centuries)]. Genesis: istoricheskiye issledovaniya [Genesis: Historical Research], 2018, no. 9, pp. 1–13. Available at: https://nbpublish. com/library_read_article.php?id=27250 (accessed: 05.12.2023). DOI: 10.25136/2409-868X.2018.9.27250 (in Russ.). Viner B. E. [Ethnicity: In Search of a Paradigm for Studying]. Etnograficheskoye obozreniye [Ethnographic Review], 1998, no. 4, pp. 3–26. (in Russ.). Zhambalova S. G. Profannyy i sakral’nyy miry ol’khonskikh buryat (XIX–XX vv.) [The Profane and Sacred Worlds of the Olkhon Buryats (19th–20th Centuries)]. Novosibirsk: Nauka Publ., 2000. (in Russ.). Zhambalova S. G., Igaue N. Kaleydoskop: etnograficheskiye kartinki XX — nachala XXI v. v ustnykh rasskazakh narodov buryatii [Kaleidoscope: Ethnographic Pictures of the 20th — Early 21st Centuries in Oral Stories of the Peoples of Buryatia]. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo BNTs SO RAN Publ., 2010. (in Russ.). |
||
Download in PDF |