Issue 2 (87)
| THE PUBLIC, GLASNOST’ AND THE LIMITS OF THE “PERMISSIBLE” ON THE EVE OF THE OPENING OF THE RUSSIAN REFORMED COURTS IN 1866 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2025 | Number | 2 (87) |
| Pages | 35-44 | Type | scientific article |
| UDC | 94(47)“1866” | BBK | 63.3(2)52 |
| Authors | Borisova Tatiana Yu. |
Topic | PUBLIC OPINION AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE IN RUSSIA |
| Summary | The article discusses the impact of the perceptions of the public on the implementation of the 1864 Judicial Reform. The focus is on previously unexamined archival materials from the Ministry of Justice that demonstrate that the reformers viewed an uneducated and underdeveloped public as a signifi threat to the independence of the judiciary. The article relies on archival records on the development of court etiquette guidelines and materials on publishing court decisions and media coverage of these decisions. These records are compared to the public position expressed by the Ministry of Justice in its journal. The author demonstrates that contrary to the rhetoric of collaboration between government and society as presented in official media, the analysis of archival sources reveals that before the opening of the new courts, the reformers sought to control public behavior in court to the greatest extent possible, turning “outsiders” into passive observers of events. The Ministry of Justice attempted to impose strict restrictions on press coverage of the new judicial system. The perception that there was a lack of development in the public sphere led to policies of restrictions, tight control, and avoidance of misinterpretations. These attempts to control the public sphere and guide the actions of new institutions in the “correct” direction raised questions about the policy of trust between the government and society. Additionally, the fairness of the new court system, which openly positioned itself above the “underdeveloped” public, was questioned. The article contributes to ongoing historiographical debates about the role of modernist discourses of backwardness in the development of the public sphere and the significance of public discourse in Russia. | ||
| Keywords | public sphere, judicial reform, public opinion, Russian Empire, justice, censorship | ||
| References |
Akelyev E. [Regimes of Publicity and the Supreme Authority in the Tsardom of Moscow and the Russian Empire]. Cahiers du Monde Russe, 2021, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 785–814. (in Russ.). Atnashev T., Velizhev M., Weiser T. [Two Centuries of Experience: From the Bourgeois Public Sphere to Russian Regimes of Publicity]. Nesovershennaya publichnaya sfera. Istoriya rezhimov publichnosti v Rossii [An Imperfect Public Sphere. History of Publicity Regimes in Russia]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2021, pp. 5–81. (in Russ.). Bernstein L. Sonia’s Daughters: Prostitutes and Their Regulation in Imperial Russia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995. (in English). Borisova Ò., Burbank J. Russia’s Legal Trajectories. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 2018, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 469–508. (in English). Chernukha V. G. Pravitel’stvennaya politika v otnoshenii pechati 1860–1870 gg. [Government Policy on the Press in the 1860s–1870s]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1978. (in Russ.). Denisenko S. V. [Theatre]. Byt pushkinskogo Peterburga: Opyt entsiklopedicheskogo slovarya. T. 2. [The Everyday Life of Pushkin’s Petersburg: Experience of an Encyclopedic Dictionary. Vol. 2]. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo Ivana Limbakha Publ., 2011, pp. 301–309. (in Russ.). Dolbilov M. D. [Useful Unreliability: On the Criticism of the Memoirs of the Creators of Peasant Emancipation]. “Tsep’ nepreryvnogo predaniya...”: sbornik statey pamyati A.G.Tartakovskogo [“The Chain of Continuous Legend...”: A Collection in Memory of A.G.Tartakovsky.] Moscow: Izd-vo RGGU Publ., 2004, pp. 266–294. (in Russ.). Engelstein L. [“Combined” Underdevelopment: Discipline and the Law in Imperial and Soviet Russia]. Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie [New Literary Observer], 2001, no. 49, pp.31–49. (in Russ.). Galkin A. G. Sudebnaya reforma 1864 goda v Rossii v kontekste obshchestvenno-politicheskoy zhizni poreformennoy Rossii (1864–1904 gg.): dokt. dis. [The 1864 Judicial Reform in Russia in the Context of Socio-Political Life of Post-Reform Russia (1864–1904): Diss. Doct.]. Moscow, 2011. (in Russ.). Gerasimov I., Glebov S., Mogilner M. The Postimperial Meets the Postcolonial: Russian Historical Experience and the Postcolonial Moment. Ab Imperio, 2013, no. 2, pp. 97–135. (in English). Grosul V. Ya. Obshchestvennoye mneniye v Rossii XIX veka [Public Opinion in 19th Century Russia]. Moscow: AIRO-XXI Publ., 2013. (in Russ.). Khristoforov I. A. “Aristokraticheskaya” oppozitsiya velikim reformam: konets 1850 — seredina 1870-kh gg. [“Aristocratic” Opposition to the Great Reforms: The End of the 1850s — the Middle of the 1870s]. Moscow: Russoke slovo Publ., 2002. (in Russ.). Korotkikh M. G. Sudebnaya reforma 1864 goda v Rossii (sushchnost’ i sotsial’no-pravovoy mekhanizm formirovaniya) [The 1864 Judicial Reform in Russia (Essence and Socio-Legal Mechanism of Formation)]. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezhskogo un-ta Publ., 1994. (in Russ.). Lincoln W. B. The Problem of Glasnost’ in Mid-Nineteenth Century Russian Politics. European Studies Review, 1981, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 171–188. (in English). Lounsbery A. Life is Elsewhere: Symbolic Geography in the Russian Provinces, 1800–1917. New York: Cornell University Press, 2019. (in English). Lovell S. How Russia Learned to Talk: A History of Public Speaking in the Stenographic Age, 1860–1930. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. (in English). Moisinovich A. M. Sudebnaya reforma 1864 g. v otsenkakh sovremennikov i issledovateley vtoroy poloviny XIX — nachala XX vv.: kand dis. [The 1864 Judicial Reform in the Assessments of Contemporaries and Researchers of the Second Half of the 19th — Early 20th Centuries: Diss. Cand.]. Moscow, 2006. (in Russ.). Nemytina M. V. Sud v Rossii: vtoraya polovina XIX — nachalo XX v. [The Court in Russia: The Second Half of the 19th — Early 20th Century]. Saratov: Izd-vo SGAP Publ., 1999. (in Russ.). Popova A. D. “Pravda i milost’ da tsarstvuyut v sudakh” (iz istorii realizatsii Sudebnoy reformy 1964 g.) [“Let Truth and Mercy Reign in the Courts” (On the History of Realization of the 1864 Judicial Reform)]. Ryazan: Poverennyy Publ., 2005. (in Russ.). Ruud Ch. A. Fighting Words: Imperial Censorship and the Russian Press, 1804–1906. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009. (in English). Troitsky N. A. Korifei rossiyskoy advokatury [The Corypheans of the Russian Bar]. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf Publ., 2006. (in Russ.). Vereshchagin A. N. Kassatsionnyy Senat (1866–1917). Ocherki ustroystva i deyatel’nosti verkhovnogo suda Rossiyskoy Imperii [Cassation Senate (1866–1917). Essays on the Structure and Activities of the Supreme Court of the Russian Empire]. Moscow: Izdatel’skaya gruppa Zakon Publ., 2022. (in Russ.). |
||
| Download in PDF | |||
