Issue 2 (91)
| THE DECLINE OF THE NOBILITY’S SOCIAL STANDING IN THE GRAND DUCHY OF FINLAND IN THE LATE 19TH — EARLY 20TH CENTURIES: CAUSES AND EFFECTS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | Number | 2 (91) |
| Pages | 41-49 | Type | scientific article |
| UDC | 94(480)”18/19” | BBK | 63.3(4Ôčí)5 |
| Authors | Rupasov Alexander I. |
Topic | THE RUSSIAN NOBILITY: INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP STRATEGIES |
| Summary | The article analyzes the causes of the decline of the nobility in the Grand Duchy of Finland, which led to their voluntary renunciation of estate-based representation in the legislative advisory Diet. The Finnish nobility’s abandonment of the remaining estate privileges was driven by several interrelated factors stemming from significant socio-economic changes in the Grand Duchy during the second half of the 19th century (industrialization, the emergence of political parties, the issue of landless peasants—known as the torpar question—and the conflict between the Svecomans and Fennomans). The nobility as an estate gradually lost its position in society. The increasing complexity of the bureaucratic apparatus significantly altered its social composition, and belonging to the nobility ceased to hold exclusive importance for one’s career. At first glance, the secularization of Finnish society led to the nobility’s reluctance to replenish the ranks of the clergy. Ownership of hereditary estates as the basis of prosperity lost its significance for many noble families: few were able to transform their landholdings into profitable enterprises. The inevitability of adapting to new conditions prompted the search for new spheres of activity. Occupations such as telegraph operator, accountant, nurse, and schoolteacher became attractive alternatives, unlike a military career (which, however, was discouraged for political reasons). Increasingly frequent inter-estate marriages gradually blurred the line between the noble and bourgeois estates. Involvement in political struggle during the so-called Russification policies at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries accelerated this process, culminating in the 1906 Diet with the nobility’s consent to relinquish estate-based representation. | ||
| Keywords | Grand Duchy of Finland, late 19th — early 20th century, Diet, estate-based representation, aristocracy, privileges, bureaucracy | ||
| References |
Alapuro R. State and Revolution in Finland. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2019. (in English). Bogomolov A. I. [Review on Monograph: Alapuro R. State and Revolution in Finland. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2019. XIV, 306 p.]. Peterburgskiy istoricheskiy zhurnal [Petersburg Historical Journal], 2019, no. 2, pp. 296–302. (in Russ.). Brander T. Hovioikeuden presidentti Ernst Fredrik Brander ja hänen jälkeläisensä [The President of the Court of Appeal Ernst Fredrik Brander and His Descendants]. Helsinki: [s. n.], 2016. (in Finnish). Hytönen V. Talonpoikaissäädyn historia Suomen valtiopäivillä 1809–1906 [The History of the Peasant Estate in the Finnish Diet 1809–1906]. Helsinki: Otava, 1926, vol. 2. (in Finnish). Ilmakunnas J., Hakanen M., Lahtinen A., Snellman A. [Research on the Nobility in Finland]. Historiallinen aikakauskirja [Historical Journal], 2013, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 203–215. DOI: 10.54331/haik.140001 (in Finnish). Jahnukainen I. Suomen aateliston historiakuva. Historiografinen tutkimus Suomen historian yleisesitysten ja Suomen aateliston omakuvan pohjalta [The Historical Image of the Finnish Nobility. A Historiographical Study Based on General Presentations of Finnish History and the Self-Image of the Finnish Nobility]. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto, 2004. (in Finnish). Jutikkala E. [The Dissolution of Estate Society in Finland]. Turun Historiallinen Arkisto [Turku Historical Archive]. Turku: Turun Historiallinen Yhdistys, 1954, no. 12, pp. 113–143. (in Swedish). Koivumäki A. Suomen aatelin edustus autonomian ajan säätyvaltiopäivillä 1863–1906 [The Representation of the Finnish Nobility in the Estate Diets of the Autonomy Period 1863–1906]. Turku: Turun yliopisto, 1968. (in Finnish). Mylly J. Edustuksellisen kansanvallan läpimurto [The Breakthrough of Representative Democracy]. Helsinki: Edita, 2006. (in Finnish). Nordenstreng S. Porvarissäädyn historia. Suomen valtiopäivillä, 1809–1906 [The History of the Burgher Estate in the Finnish Diet, 1809–1906]. Helsinki: Otava, 1921, vol. 5. (in Finnish). Paju P. [Carl Robert Mannerheim as a Technology Entrepreneur]. Tekniikan Waiheita [Phases of Technology], 2010, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16–27. (in Finnish). Ridanpää J. “Den store gamle”. Leo Mechelinin henkilökultti vuosina 1899–1915 [“The Great Old Man”. The Personality Cult of Leo Mechelin from 1899–1915]. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto, 2018. (in Finnish). Snellman A. Suomen aateli: yhteiskunnan huipulta uusiin rooleihin 1809–1939 [The Finnish Nobility: From the Top of Society to New Roles 1809–1939]. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto, 2014. (in Finnish). Snellman A. The Economic and Social Transformation of the Finnish Landed Elite, 1800–2000. Virtus — Journal of Nobility Studies, 2016, vol. 23, pp. 125–146. (in English). Tandefelt H., Vainio-Kurtakko M. [A Nobleman’s Choices in a Bourgeoisifying Society. The Artist Albert Edelfelt and Baron Viktor Magnus von Born c. 1870–1900]. Historiallinen aikakauskirja [Historical Journal], 2013, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 185–199. DOI: 10.54331/haik.139999 (in Finnish). Tuloisela T. Säätyyhteiskunnan hajoaminen ja aateliston privilegioiden purkaminen Suomessa: pro gradututkielma [The Disintegration of the Estate Society and the Abolition of Noble Privileges in Finland: A Master’s Thesis]. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto, 1992. (in Finnish). Westerlund L. [Provincial Administration 1808–1917]. Suomen keskushallinnon historia 1809–1996 [The History of Central Government in Finland 1809–1996]. Helsinki: Edita, 1996, pp. 343–378. (in Finnish). Ylönen I. The Experience of Impecuniousness in a Noble Family at the End of the Nineteenth Century. Journal of Finnish Studies, 2017, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 167–196. DOI: 10.5406/28315081.20.1.07 (in English). |
||
| Download in PDF | |||
